Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20532517›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2010

[Advantages and disadvantages of heavy silicone oil].

B Kirchhof

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

B KirchhofAbt. für Netzhaut- und Glaskörperchirurgie, Zentrum für Augenheilkunde der Universität Köln, Deutschland. bekirchhof@googlemail.com
Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy silicone oil does not have any evidence-based advantages or disadvantages over conventional silicone oil. It is up to the surgeon to choose the type of tamponade considered to be most suitable for the individual eye. Suitable indications for heavy silicone oil are, for example proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and risk of PVR in the lower retina. Persistent or complicated macular holes can often be closed with heavy oil but in exchange higher rates of emulsification and cataracts are to be expected. Heavy silicone oils should not remain in the eye for longer than approximately 2 months, therefore, severe ocular trauma and ocular hypotension are not suitable indications. Initial technical difficulties to remove sticky (rare) oil from the retina have now been overcome by using liquid perfluorocarbons.

Indexed as

CataractHumansRetinal PerforationsRisk FactorsSilicone OilsVitrectomyVitreoretinopathy, ProliferativeSilicone Oils

Identifiers

PMID20532517
OpenAlexW1572491621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.