ArticleDer Anaesthesist2010
[Different case fatality rates at German trauma centres : Critical analysis].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between motor fitness, fundamental movement skills, and quality of movement patterns in primary school children.PloS one · 2021Article
- [Empirical evaluation of quality indicators for severely injured patients in the TraumaRegister DGU®].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Article
- [In order to see clearly it is often sufficient just to change the perspective].Der Unfallchirurg · 2016Article
- [The aim of stimulating discussions on preclinical intubation has been reached].Der Unfallchirurg · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe level of trauma care in Germany belongs to one of the best worldwide. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown significant differences in the case fatality rates of multiple trauma patients in German trauma centres. The objective of this study was to indentify the reasons for the different outcomes based on data of the trauma registry of the German Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology.
methodsDue to the inadequacy of comparing only the case fataltiy rates in the different trauma centres, the data recorded in the trauma registry were analyzed in a retrospective, multicentre study to calculate the probability of survival, revised injury severity classification (RISC) and, additionally, the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for ranking of the participating trauma centres. As a criterion for inclusion in the study, a minimum of 100 trauma patients admitted directly from the scene within a 4 year period was set. The ranking was carried out using the SMR (observed mortality divided by probability of survival). With the help of data from the trauma registry an attempt was made to find the differences in trauma management between the top 10 centres (lowest SMR), the 10 middle and the last 10 centres (highest SMR) in the ranking.
resultsThe data of 6,522 patients were included in the study. There were significant differences in the pre-hospital time, the time spent in the emergency room (ER) and time until a CT scan had been performed. Pre-hospital time was longer in patients admitted to the top centres, whereas time in the ER was longer in the last centres of the ranking. Comparing the sum of pre-hospital time and time in the ER, there were no differences between the top and the last centres. At the scene of accident overall intubation rate and intubation rate in patients with traumatic brain injury were higher in patients admitted to the top centres. Regarding the transport modality, significantly more patients were transported by helicopter in the group of the top centres. In top centres CT scans, in particular whole-body CTs, were initiated sooner and used much more frequently so that the rate of missed injuries was much lower. The amount of fluid given at the scene of accident did not differ between the centres but the amount of fluid given in ER and the operating room until admission to the intensive care unit was significantly higher in the top centres.
conclusionThere are significant differences in the pre-hospital and clinical care of patients admitted to German trauma centres. Under clinical conditions a tight time management, an immediate and complete diagnostic approach, particularly by means of whole-body CT and a liberal fluid resuscitation seem to be favorable factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.