ArticlePloS one2010
Validation of coevolving residue algorithms via pipeline sensitivity analysis: ELSC and OMES and ZNMI, oh my!
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of coevolving positions by ancestral reconstruction.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Identification of positions in human aldolase a that are neutral for apparent KArchives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2024Article
- Rheostats, toggles, and neutrals, Oh my! A new framework for understanding how amino acid changes modulate protein function.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024Review
- Article
- Rheostat functional outcomes occur when substitutions are introduced at nonconserved positions that diverge with speciation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Article
- IMPContact: An Interhelical Residue Contact Prediction Method.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Using Evolution to Guide Protein Engineering: The Devil IS in the Details.Biophysical journal · 2016Review
- Article
- Emerging Computational Methods for the Rational Discovery of Allosteric Drugs.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Article
- Predicting the Effect of Mutations on Protein-Protein Binding Interactions through Structure-Based Interface Profiles.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Covariation Is a Poor Measure of Molecular Coevolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Did α-Synuclein and Glucocerebrosidase Coevolve? Implications for Parkinson's Disease.PloS one · 2015Article
- Emerging methods in protein co-evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013Review
- Multiple co-evolutionary networks are supported by the common tertiary scaffold of the LacI/GalR proteins.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
- Mutual information and variants for protein domain-domain contact prediction.BMC research notes · 2012Article
- A coevolutionary residue network at the site of a functionally important conformational change in a phosphohexomutase enzyme family.PloS one · 2012Article
- Computational enzyme design approaches with significant biological outcomes: progress and challenges.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Correlated amino acid substitution algorithms attempt to discover groups of residues that co-fluctuate due to either structural or functional constraints. Although these algorithms could inform both ab initio protein folding calculations and evolutionary studies, their utility for these purposes has been hindered by a lack of confidence in their predictions due to hard to control sources of error. To complicate matters further, naive users are confronted with a multitude of methods to choose from, in addition to the mechanics of assembling and pruning a dataset. We first introduce a new pair scoring method, called ZNMI (Z-scored-product Normalized Mutual Information), which drastically improves the performance of mutual information for co-fluctuating residue prediction. Second and more important, we recast the process of finding coevolving residues in proteins as a data-processing pipeline inspired by the medical imaging literature. We construct an ensemble of alignment partitions that can be used in a cross-validation scheme to assess the effects of choices made during the procedure on the resulting predictions. This pipeline sensitivity study gives a measure of reproducibility (how similar are the predictions given perturbations to the pipeline?) and accuracy (are residue pairs with large couplings on average close in tertiary structure?). We choose a handful of published methods, along with ZNMI, and compare their reproducibility and accuracy on three diverse protein families. We find that (i) of the algorithms tested, while none appear to be both highly reproducible and accurate, ZNMI is one of the most accurate by far and (ii) while users should be wary of predictions drawn from a single alignment, considering an ensemble of sub-alignments can help to determine both highly accurate and reproducible couplings. Our cross-validation approach should be of interest both to developers and end users of algorithms that try to detect correlated amino acid substitutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.