Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20531944›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

The acid test of fluoride: how pH modulates toxicity.

Ramaswamy Sharma, Masahiro Tsuchiya, Ziedonis Skobe, Bakhos A Tannous, John D Bartlett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A mini review of fluoride-induced apoptotic pathways.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Review
  15. How pH is regulated during amelogenesis in dental fluorosis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Meeting report: a hard look at the state of enamel research.International journal of oral science · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramaswamy SharmaDepartment of Cytokine Biology, Forsyth Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Masahiro Tsuchiya
Ziedonis Skobe
Bakhos A Tannous
John D Bartlett
Harvard University Press · USHarvard University · USTohoku University · JP

Funding

THE ROLE OF STRESS AND PH IN FLUOROSISR01DE018106 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, JOHN D · 2009 to 2016
$3.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE018106NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not known why the ameloblasts responsible for dental enamel formation are uniquely sensitive to fluoride (F(-)). Herein, we present a novel theory with supporting data to show that the low pH environment of maturating stage ameloblasts enhances their sensitivity to a given dose of F(-). Enamel formation is initiated in a neutral pH environment (secretory stage); however, the pH can fall to below 6.0 as most of the mineral precipitates (maturation stage). Low pH can facilitate entry of F(-) into cells. Here, we asked if F(-) was more toxic at low pH, as measured by increased cell stress and decreased cell function. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTreatment of ameloblast-derived LS8 cells with F(-) at low pH reduced the threshold dose of F(-) required to phosphorylate stress-related proteins, PERK, eIF2alpha, JNK and c-jun. To assess protein secretion, LS8 cells were stably transduced with a secreted reporter, Gaussia luciferase, and secretion was quantified as a function of F(-) dose and pH. Luciferase secretion significantly decreased within 2 hr of F(-) treatment at low pH versus neutral pH, indicating increased functional toxicity. Rats given 100 ppm F(-) in their drinking water exhibited increased stress-mediated phosphorylation of eIF2alpha in maturation stage ameloblasts (pH<6.0) as compared to secretory stage ameloblasts (pH approximately 7.2). Intriguingly, F(-)-treated rats demonstrated a striking decrease in transcripts expressed during the maturation stage of enamel development (Klk4 and Amtn). In contrast, the expression of secretory stage genes, AmelX, Ambn, Enam and Mmp20, was unaffected.

conclusionsThe low pH environment of maturation stage ameloblasts facilitates the uptake of F(-), causing increased cell stress that compromises ameloblast function, resulting in dental fluorosis.

Indexed as

AcidsAmeloblastsAnimalsFluoridesGene Expression RegulationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, BiologicalProteinsRatsStress, PhysiologicalAcidsFluoridesProteins

Identifiers

PMID20531944
PMCPMC2878349
OpenAlexW2135184057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.