Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20531284›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2010

Role of allo-SCT for CML in 2010.

N Venepalli, K Rezvani, S Mielke, B N Savani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

N VenepalliDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Section, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1301 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
K Rezvani
S Mielke
B N Savani
Hammersmith Hospital · GBUniversity of Würzburg · DEVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of CML. However, for a minority of patients who fail TKI or progress to advanced phase disease, allo-SCT remains the only therapeutic option. This review addresses the current indications for allo-SCT in CML and the role of conditioning (myeloablative vs reduced intensity), donor source (sibling vs volunteer unrelated donor), graft source (BM vs peripheral blood vs cord) and the value of pre-, peri- and post transplant use of TKI in the management of CML.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive

Identifiers

PMID20531284
OpenAlexW1993085686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.