Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20531276›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks.

Laurent Philippot, Siv G E Andersson, Tom J Battin, James I Prosser, Joshua P Schimel, William B Whitman, Sara Hallin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
235citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

235 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Microbial ecology of shallow groundwater ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurent PhilippotDepartment of Soil and Environmental Microbiology, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, University of Burgundy, BP 86510, 21065 Dijon, France. Laurent.Philippot@dijon.inra.fr
Siv G E Andersson
Tom J Battin
James I Prosser
Joshua P Schimel
William B Whitman
Sara Hallin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The species is a fundamental unit of biological organization, but its relevance for Bacteria and Archaea is still hotly debated. Even more controversial is whether the deeper branches of the ribosomal RNA-derived phylogenetic tree, such as the phyla, have ecological importance. Here, we discuss the ecological coherence of high bacterial taxa in the light of genome analyses and present examples of niche differentiation between deeply diverging groups in terrestrial and aquatic systems. The ecological relevance of high bacterial taxa has implications for bacterial taxonomy, evolution and ecology.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaDNA, BacterialHumansMetagenomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID20531276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.