Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20531223›Full record

SynthesisJournal of hypertension2010

The association of depression with adherence to antihypertensive medications: a systematic review.

Chete M Eze-Nliam, Brett D Thombs, Bruno B Lima, Cheri G Smith, Roy C Ziegelstein

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of hypertension, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of mental disorders on active TB treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chete M Eze-NliamDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Brett D Thombs
Bruno B Lima
Cheri G Smith
Roy C Ziegelstein

Funding

Center for Mind-Body ResearchR24AT004641 · NCCIH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAYTHORNTHWAITE, JENNIFER A · 2007 to 2009
$2.9M
CIHRNCCIH NIH HHS R24 AT004641NCCIH NIH HHS R24AT004641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the strength and consistency of the evidence on the relationship between depression and adherence to antihypertensive medications.

methodsThe MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, SCOPUS, and ISI databases were searched from inception until 11 December 2009 for published studies of original research that assessed adherence to antihypertensive medications and used a standardized interview, validated questionnaire, or International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision code to assess depression or symptoms of depression in patients with hypertension. Manual searching was conducted on 22 selected journals. Citations of included articles were tracked using Web of Science and Google Scholar. Two investigators independently extracted data from the selected articles and discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

resultsEight studies were identified that included a total of 42,790 patients. Ninety-five percent of these patients were from one study. Only four of the studies had the assessment of this relationship as a primary objective. Adherence rates varied from 29 to 91%. There were widely varying results within and across studies. All eight studies reported at least one significant bivariate or multivariate negative relationship between depression and adherence to antihypertensive medications. Insignificant findings in bivariate or multivariate analyses were reported in six of eight studies.

conclusionAll studies reported statistically significant relationships between depression and poor adherence to antihypertensive medications, but definitive conclusions cannot be drawn because of substantial heterogeneity between studies with respect to the assessment of depression and adherence, as well as inconsistencies in results both within and between studies. Additional studies would help clarify this relationship.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsDepressionFemaleHumansHypertensionInformation Storage and RetrievalMaleMultivariate AnalysisPatient ComplianceAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20531223
PMCPMC2923094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.