ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010
Short term impact of smoke-free legislation in England: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluation of Population-Level Tobacco Control Interventions and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Low cigarette consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: meta-analysis of 141 cohort studies in 55 study reports.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Pooled it
- Smokefree legislation effects on respiratory and sensory disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- The effects of smoke-free legislation on acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2013Pooled it
- Association between smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for cardiac, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases: a meta-analysis.Circulation · 2012Pooled it
- Trends in circulatory system disease hospitalizations in England and Wales: A 21-year secular-trend analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- The public health ethics and economics of prioritizing prevention and equity.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Does raising tobacco taxes reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases? A panel data analysis of 152 countries.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Association between the extension of smoke-free legislation and incident acute myocardial infarctions in Singapore from 2010 to 2019: an interrupted time-series analysis.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- An appeal to our government for nationwide policies in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022Review
- Attitudes of staff towards smoke-free environments in psychiatric hospitals in Germany.Tobacco induced diseases · 2022Article
- Article
- Twenty-year sociodemographic trends in lung cancer in non-smokers: A UK-based cohort study of 3.7 million people.Cancer epidemiology · 2020Article
- Impact of a comprehensive tobacco control policy package on acute myocardial infarction and stroke hospital admissions in Beijing, China: interrupted time series study.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Prevalence of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Changing Meteorological Conditions in Iran: Fuzzy Clustering Approach.Iranian journal of public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Impact of smoke-free legislation on acute myocardial infarction and stroke mortality: Tianjin, China, 2007-2015.Tobacco control · 2020Article
- Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential.European heart journal · 2018Review
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo measure the short term impact on hospital admissions for myocardial infarction of the introduction of smoke-free legislation in England on 1 July 2007.
designAn interrupted time series design with routinely collected hospital episode statistics data. Analysis of admissions from July 2002 to September 2008 (providing five years' data from before the legislation and 15 months' data from after) using segmented Poisson regression.
settingEngland. Population All patients aged 18 or older living in England with an emergency admission coded with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
main outcome measuresWeekly number of completed hospital admissions.
resultsAfter adjustment for secular and seasonal trends and variation in population size, there was a small but significant reduction in the number of emergency admissions for myocardial infarction after the implementation of smoke-free legislation (-2.4%, 95% confidence interval -4.06% to -0.66%, P=0.007). This equates to 1200 fewer emergency admissions for myocardial infarction (1600 including readmissions) in the first year after legislation. The reduction in admissions was significant in men (3.1%, P=0.001) and women (3.8%, P=0.007) aged 60 and over, and men (3.5%, P<0.01) but not women (2.5% P=0.38) aged under 60.
conclusionThis study adds to a growing body of evidence that smoke-free legislation leads to reductions in myocardial infarctions. It builds on previous work by showing that such declines are observed even when underlying reductions in admissions and potential confounders are controlled for. The considerably smaller decline in admissions observed in England compared with many other jurisdictions probably reflects aspects of the study design and the relatively low levels of exposure to secondhand smoke in England before the legislation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.