Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20530266›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2010

Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms.

Jane Oliaro, Vanessa Van Ham, Faruk Sacirbegovic, Anupama Pasam, Ze'ev Bomzon, Kim Pham, Mandy J Ludford-Menting, Nigel J Waterhouse, Michael Bots, Edwin D Hawkins and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Biological Significance of Trogocytosis.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dances with Cells.Critical reviews in immunology · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Maps of variability in cell lineage trees.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  19. Polarity as a physiological modulator of cell function.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2019
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane OliaroCancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia.
Vanessa Van Ham
Faruk Sacirbegovic
Anupama Pasam
Ze'ev Bomzon
Kim Pham
Mandy J Ludford-Menting
Nigel J Waterhouse
Michael Bots
Edwin D Hawkins
Sally V Watt
Leonie A Cluse
Chris J P Clarke
David J Izon
John T Chang
Natalie Thompson
Min Gu
Ricky W Johnstone
Mark J Smyth
Patrick O Humbert
Steven L Reiner
Sarah M Russell
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USCancer Council Victoria · AUCancer Research Institute · USMelbourne Bioinformatics · AUSt Vincents Institute of Medical Research · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

HELPER T CELL REGULATION IN MURINE LEISHMANIASISR01AI042370 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REINER, STEVEN L · 1998 to 2012
$4.8M
Asymmetric Lymphocyte Division in the Immune ResponseR01AI076458 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REINER, STEVEN L · 2008 to 2019
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042370NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI076458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asymmetric cell division is a potential means by which cell fate choices during an immune response are orchestrated. Defining the molecular mechanisms that underlie asymmetric division of T cells is paramount for determining the role of this process in the generation of effector and memory T cell subsets. In other cell types, asymmetric cell division is regulated by conserved polarity protein complexes that control the localization of cell fate determinants and spindle orientation during division. We have developed a tractable, in vitro model of naive CD8(+) T cells undergoing initial division while attached to dendritic cells during Ag presentation to investigate whether similar mechanisms might regulate asymmetric division of T cells. Using this system, we show that direct interactions with APCs provide the cue for polarization of T cells. Interestingly, the immunological synapse disseminates before division even though the T cells retain contact with the APC. The cue from the APC is translated into polarization of cell fate determinants via the polarity network of the Par3 and Scribble complexes, and orientation of the mitotic spindle during division is orchestrated by the partner of inscuteable/G protein complex. These findings suggest that T cells have selectively adapted a number of evolutionarily conserved mechanisms to generate diversity through asymmetric cell division.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell AdhesionCell DivisionCell PolarityCells, CulturedConserved SequenceMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicT-Lymphocyte Subsets

Identifiers

PMID20530266
PMCPMC3739982
OpenAlexW1525658429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.