Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20530230›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Development, validation, and routine application of a high-performance liquid chromatography method coupled with a single mass detector for quantification of itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole in human plasma.

Lorena Baietto, Antonio D'Avolio, Giusi Ventimiglia, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Marco Siccardi, Marco Simiele, Mauro Sciandra, Giovanni Di Perri

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Gender and Age on Voriconazole Trough Concentrations in Italian Adult Patients.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorena BaiettoLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Corso Svizzera 164, 10149 Turin, Italy. lorena.baietto@libero.it
Antonio D'Avolio
Giusi Ventimiglia
Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Marco Siccardi
Marco Simiele
Mauro Sciandra
Giovanni Di Perri
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed and validated a high-performance liquid chromatography method coupled with a mass detector to quantify itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole using quinoxaline as the internal standard. The method involves protein precipitation with acetonitrile. Mean accuracy (percent deviation from the true value) and precision (relative standard deviation percentage) were less than 15%. Mean recovery was more than 80% for all drugs quantified. The lower limit of quantification was 0.031 microg/ml for itraconazole and posaconazole and 0.039 microg/ml for voriconazole. The calibration range tested was from 0.031 to 8 microg/ml for itraconazole and posaconazole and from 0.039 to 10 microg/ml for voriconazole.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCalibrationChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansItraconazoleMass SpectrometryPyrimidinesReference StandardsTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsItraconazoleposaconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID20530230
PMCPMC2916319
OpenAlexW2124547728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.