Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20529889›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010

ACNE: a summarization method to estimate allele-specific copy numbers for Affymetrix SNP arrays.

Maria Ortiz-Estevez, Henrik Bengtsson, Angel Rubio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Progenetix oncogenomic resource in 2021.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Getting DNA copy numbers without control samples.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Ortiz-EstevezGroup of Bioinformatics, CEIT and TECNUN, University of Navarra, San Sebastian, Spain.
Henrik Bengtsson
Angel Rubio

Funding

The Berkeley Cancer Genome CenterU24CA126551 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 2006 to 2009
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationCurrent algorithms for estimating DNA copy numbers (CNs) borrow concepts from gene expression analysis methods. However, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have special characteristics that, if taken into account, can improve the overall performance. For example, cross hybridization between alleles occurs in SNP probe pairs. In addition, most of the current CN methods are focused on total CNs, while it has been shown that allele-specific CNs are of paramount importance for some studies. Therefore, we have developed a summarization method that estimates high-quality allele-specific CNs.

resultsThe proposed method estimates the allele-specific DNA CNs for all Affymetrix SNP arrays dealing directly with the cross hybridization between probes within SNP probesets. This algorithm outperforms (or at least it performs as well as) other state-of-the-art algorithms for computing DNA CNs. It better discerns an aberration from a normal state and it also gives more precise allele-specific CNs. AVAILABILITY: The method is available in the open-source R package ACNE, which also includes an add on to the aroma.affymetrix framework (http://www.aroma-project.org/).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAllelesGene DosageComputational BiologyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID20529889
PMCPMC2913655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.