Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20529879›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2010

CCancer: a bird's eye view on gene lists reported in cancer-related studies.

Sabine Dietmann, Wanseon Lee, Philip Wong, Igor Rodchenkov, Alexey V Antonov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TAp73 transcriptionally represses BNIP3 expression.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. TAp73 promotes anabolism.Oncotarget · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sabine DietmannFreiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modeling, University of Freiburg, Eckerstr. 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Wanseon Lee
Philip Wong
Igor Rodchenkov
Alexey V Antonov

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CCancer is an automatically collected database of gene lists, which were reported mostly by experimental studies in various biological and clinical contexts. At the moment, the database covers 3369 gene lists extracted from 2644 papers published in approximately 80 peer-reviewed journals. As input, CCancer accepts a gene list. An enrichment analyses is implemented to generate, as output, a highly informative survey over recently published studies that report gene lists, which significantly intersect with the query gene list. A report on gene pairs from the input list which were frequently reported together by other biological studies is also provided. CCancer is freely available at http://mips.helmholtz-muenchen.de/proj/ccancer.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenes, NeoplasmSoftwareAniline CompoundsCellular SenescenceData MiningGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInternetMonte Carlo MethodNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsNitrilesProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinolinesAniline CompoundsbosutinibNeoplasm ProteinsNitrilesProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID20529879
PMCPMC2896190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.