Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20529238›Full record

ReviewBMC biology2010

Smart biomaterials - regulating cell behavior through signaling molecules.

Aneta J Mieszawska, David L Kaplan

Abstract readCommentReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Osteoimmunomodulatory Nanoparticles for Bone Regeneration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Designing Smart Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
  9. Smart Radiation Therapy Biomaterials.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Matricellular proteins and biomaterials.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Biomolecule gradient in micropatterned nanofibrous scaffold for spatiotemporal release.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Nanoparticles and their potential for application in bone.International journal of nanomedicine · 2012
    Review
  18. New biomaterials for bone regeneration.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aneta J MieszawskaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA 02155, USA. aneta.mieszawska@tufts.edu
David L Kaplan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Important advances in the field of tissue engineering are arising from increased interest in novel biomaterial designs with bioactive components that directly influence cell behavior. Following the recent work of Mitchell and co-workers published in BMC Biology, we review how spatial and temporal control of signaling molecules in a matrix material regulates cellular responses for tissue-specific applications.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCell ProliferationBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Cell SurvivalLeukemia Inhibitory FactorNerve Growth FactorNerve RegenerationNeuronsOsteogenesisOsteopontinSignal TransductionTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Leukemia Inhibitory FactorNerve Growth FactorOsteopontin

Identifiers

PMID20529238
PMCPMC2873335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.