Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20528752›Full record

ReviewCurrent stem cell research & therapy2010

Therapeutic window, a critical developmental stage for stem cell therapies.

Shengwen Calvin Li, Yuan-Ping Han, Brent A Dethlefs, William G Loudon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current stem cell research & therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Functional endoscopy techniques for tracking stem cell fate.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Increase developmental plasticity of human keratinocytes with gene suppression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shengwen Calvin LiNeuro-Oncology Research Laboratory, Center for Neuroscience and Stem Cell Research, CHOC Children's Hospital, 455 S. Main Street, Orange, CA 92868-3874, USA. shengwel@uci.edu
Yuan-Ping Han
Brent A Dethlefs
William G Loudon
Children's Hospital of Orange County · US

Funding

Hepatic Stellate Cell Derived MMP9 in Liver FibrogenesisR01DK069418 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HAN, YUAN-PING · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
ACT,a pathophysiological inhibitor of MMP-9 activationR01AR051558 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HAN, YUAN-PING · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
IDENTIFICATION OF CAVEOLIN-INTERACTING MOLECULESF32CA071326 · NCI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI LI, SHENGWEN CALVIN · 1996 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA071326NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051558NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051558-5NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069418NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069418-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In children, cancers are the deadliest of diseases and second only to accidents as the leading cause of death. The deadliest of the brain cancers are the malignant gliomas. Approximately two-thirds of children can survive less malignant types of brain cancers, however, in ~67% of these survivors recurs under the current regimes of surgery followed by administration of high doses toxic drugs and exposure to high doses of radiation. Even more distressing is that fortunate survivors are generally left with life-long cognitive disabilities. A new medical approach is desperately needed. Stem cells, with their natural ability to seek out brain tumors, could be used to accurately deliver therapy directly to the cancer sparing normal tissues for suppression of tumor growth. Despite exciting initial reports, clinical potency of stem cell therapy in animal brain tumor models has to date proven disappointing. Attempts to extrapolate the animal study results to humans are stymied by the fact that stem cells are heterogeneous, resulting in differences in their efficacy. Indeed, therapeutic success relies on an effective strategy to select for a stem cell sub-population within some particular stage of the development at which they are competitive and capable of targeting brain tumors. To improve this during developmental path, concept of a 'therapeutic window' is proposed. The "therapeutic window" for stem cells or more specifically a "biochemical therapeutic window" can be determined from biochemical assays and a "biological therapeutic window" from biological assays or even a molecular window for genetic description. Taken together, we can use selective processes to generate more effective stem cells to treat cancers as is clearly needed today.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell MovementChildCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalGliomaHumansModels, BiologicalTumor MicroenvironmentCytokines

Identifiers

PMID20528752
PMCPMC6546416
OpenAlexW2153308392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.