Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20528008›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2010

Interspecies scaling for the prediction of drug clearance in children: application of maximum lifespan potential and an empirical correction factor.

Iftekhar Mahmood

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iftekhar MahmoodDivision of Hematology, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA. iftekhar.mahmood@fda.hhs.gov
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveInterspecies pharmacokinetic scaling is widely used to predict pharmacokinetic parameters in adult humans but has not been used for the prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters in children. The current study was undertaken to evaluate whether or not drug clearance in children from adult rat, dog and human clearance values could be predicted allometrically.

methodsFour methods (simple allometry, maximum lifespan potential [MLP], MLP with an empirical correction factor and a fixed exponent of 0.75 in association with adult data) were used for the prediction of drug clearance in children. The first three methods included adult animal (rat and dog) data and human data, whereas the fixed exponent of 0.75 included only adult human data.

resultsThe results of this study indicated that simple allometry would systematically overpredict drug clearance in children, whereas application of MLP would underpredict drug clearance in children. Therefore, an empirical correction factor was introduced into MLP, which substantially improved the prediction of drug clearance in children. Prediction based on a fixed exponent of 0.75 and adult human clearance was highly erratic and inferior to the prediction of drug clearance in children from MLP or MLP with an empirical correction factor.

conclusionsOverall, the results of the study indicated that interspecies scaling using adult rat, dog and human clearance values could be useful to predict drug clearance in children in different age groups.

Indexed as

Metabolic Clearance RatePredictive Value of TestsAdolescentAge FactorsAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolDogsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMethodsModels, TheoreticalPharmacokineticsRatsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID20528008
OpenAlexW199787334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.