Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20527806›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2010

Probing the interaction of archaeal DNA polymerases with deaminated bases using X-ray crystallography and non-hydrogen bonding isosteric base analogues.

Tom Killelea, Samantak Ghosh, Samuel S Tan, Pauline Heslop, Susan J Firbank, Eric T Kool, Bernard A Connolly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Replicative DNA polymerases.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antimutator variants of DNA polymerases.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom KilleleaInstitute of Cell and Molecular Biosciences (ICaMB), The University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Samantak Ghosh
Samuel S Tan
Pauline Heslop
Susan J Firbank
Eric T Kool
Bernard A Connolly
Stanford University · US

Funding

Probing Nucleotide Recognition in the Genetic Information PathwayR01GM072705 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOOL, ERIC T. · 2004 to 2012
$2.4M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F00687X/1NIGMS NIH HHS GM072705NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archaeal family-B DNA polymerases stall replication on encountering the pro-mutagenic bases uracil and hypoxanthine. This publication describes an X-ray crystal structure of Thermococcus gorgonarius polymerase in complex with a DNA containing hypoxanthine in the single-stranded region of the template, two bases ahead of the primer-template junction. Full details of the specific recognition of hypoxanthine are revealed, allowing a comparison with published data that describe uracil binding. The two bases are recognized by the same pocket, in the N-terminal domain, and make very similar protein-DNA interactions. Specificity for hypoxanthine (and uracil) arises from a combination of polymerase-base hydrogen bonds and shape fit between the deaminated bases and the pocket. The structure with hypoxanthine at position 2 explains the stimulation of the polymerase 3'-5' proofreading exonuclease, observed with deaminated bases at this location. A beta-hairpin element, involved in partitioning the primer strand between the polymerase and exonuclease active sites, inserts between the two template bases at the extreme end of the double-stranded DNA. This denatures the two complementary primer bases and directs the resulting 3' single-stranded extension toward the exonuclease active site. Finally, the relative importance of hydrogen bonding and shape fit in determining selectivity for deaminated bases has been examined using nonpolar isosteres. Affinity for both 2,4-difluorobenzene and fluorobenzimidazole, non-hydrogen bonding shape mimics of uracil and hypoxanthine, respectively, is strongly diminished, suggesting polar protein-base contacts are important. However, residual interaction with 2,4-difluorobenzene is seen, confirming a role for shape recognition.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayDeaminationDNADNA, ArchaealDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersDNA, Single-StrandedExonucleasesHydrogen BondingHypoxanthineInorganic ChemicalsUracilX-RaysDNADNA, ArchaealDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersDNA, Single-StrandedExonucleasesHypoxanthineInorganic ChemicalsUracil

Identifiers

PMID20527806
PMCPMC2901926
OpenAlexW2039619397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.