Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20526843›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2010

Survival of bifidobacteria in adult intestinal tract.

M Grmanová, E Vlková, V Rada, I Homutová

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M GrmanováDepartment of Microbiology, Nutrition, and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
E Vlková
V Rada
I Homutová
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "cocktail" of human origin rifampicin-resistant bifidobacteria (RRBs) and RRBs from commercial products was administrated to 9 volunteers aged from 22 to 46 years and the survival ability in gastrointestinal tract of these strains was determined. Bifidobacteria represented 0-8 % of total anaerobes detected in gastrointestinal tract of volunteers before the administration of probiotic strains. After the administration of probiotics, bifidobacterial counts increased to 16 % of total bacterial counts. RRBs formed 9-44 % of total counts of bifidobacteria. Then, the counts of RRBs decreased at day 7 after administration, and they were not detected after 14 d. In our study, suitable probiotic bifidobacterial strains for human should be chosen on the basic of in vitro test but the results showed that no strain was able to colonize human tract permanently.

Indexed as

Microbial ViabilityAdultBifidobacteriumColony Count, MicrobialGastrointestinal TractHuman ExperimentationHumansMiddle AgedProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID20526843
OpenAlexW2011814835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.