Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20526791›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2010

Bacterial aging: from mechanistic basis to evolutionary perspective.

Krzysztof Ksiazek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Design-build-test of recombinantSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Nontraditional systems in aging research: an update.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  9. Senescence in Bacteria and Its Underlying Mechanisms.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Krzysztof KsiazekDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Medical Sciences, Swiecickiego 6, 60-781, Poznań, Poland. kksiazek@ump.edu.pl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging-defined as the progressive impairment of an organism's functional capacity, resulting from deleterious changes in cells, organs, and biological systems-is one of the most fundamental features of Eukaryotes, from humans to the unicellular budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It has recently been reported that this may also be the case for certain (if not all) types of bacteria. In this paper, the current view on the mechanistic background and evolutionary significance of bacterial kind of aging is presented, with particular emphasis on the role of asymmetric cell division, the characteristics of stationary growth phase, and the role of oxidative protein damage.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell DivisionBacteriaOxidative StressTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20526791
PMCPMC11115482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.