Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20526773›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2011

Imaging pattern of calvarial lesions in adults.

Jarred Garfinkle, Denis Melançon, Maria Cortes, Donatella Tampieri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiological and Surgical Findings of Patients with Intradiploic Mass Lesion: Case Series and Systematic Review.Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Radiological review of skull lesions.Insights into imaging · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Metastasis in Adult Brain Tumors.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jarred GarfinkleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital-McGill University Health Center, 3801 Rue University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. jarred.garfinkle@mail.mcgill.ca
Denis Melançon
Maria Cortes
Donatella Tampieri
McGill University · CAMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calvarial lesions often present themselves as clinically silent findings on skull radiographs or as palpable masses that may cause localized pain or soreness. This review aims to explore the radiographic, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of calvarial neoplastic, inflammatory, and congenital lesions that are common in adults in order to facilitate a structured approach to their diagnosis and limit the differential diagnosis. In addition to reviewing the literature, we reviewed the records of 141 patients of the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital with radiologically documented calvarial lesions between 2001 and June 2009. CT is ideal for detecting bony lesions and is helpful in precisely localizing a lesion pre-surgically. MRI is best at identifying intradiploic lesions before they affect the cortical tables and is able to establish extraosseous involvement, especially when paramagnetic contrast is employed.

Indexed as

Epidermal CystHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSkullSkull NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID20526773
OpenAlexW1977417439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.