ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2010
DNA typing in wildlife crime: recent developments in species identification.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human costal cartilage, tooth cavities, and femur nutrient canals-new niches for insects used in forensic entomology.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- Article
- Universal mtDNA fragment for Cervidae barcoding species identification using phylogeny and preliminary analysis of machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Molecular Sexing and Species Detection of Antlered European Hunting Game for Forensic Purposes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Addressing the illegal wildlife trade in the European Union as a public health issue to draw decision makers attention.Biological conservation · 2020Review
- Molecular tools for identification of shark species involved in depredation incidents in Western Australian fisheries.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- Where is the game? Wild meat products authentication in South Africa: a case study.Investigative genetics · 2013Article
- A universal method for species identification of mammals utilizing next generation sequencing for the analysis of DNA mixtures.PloS one · 2013Article
- Bite through the tent.International journal of legal medicine · 2012Article
- An overview to the investigative approach to species testing in wildlife forensic science.Investigative genetics · 2011Article
- Combating wildlife crime.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species identification has become a tool in the investigation of acts of alleged wildlife crimes. This review details the steps required in DNA testing in wildlife crime investigations and highlights recent developments where not only can individual species be identified within a mixture of species but multiple species can be identified simultaneously. 'What species is this?' is a question asked frequently in wildlife crime investigations. Depending on the material being examined, DNA analysis may offer the best opportunity to answer this question. Species testing requires the comparison of the DNA type from the unknown sample to DNA types on a database. The areas of DNA tested are on the mitochondria and include predominantly the cytochrome b gene and the cytochrome oxidase I gene. Standard analysis requires the sequencing of part of one of these genes and comparing the sequence to that held on a repository of DNA sequences such as the GenBank database. Much of the DNA sequence of either of these two genes is conserved with only parts being variable. A recent development is to target areas of those sequences that are specific to a species; this can increase the sensitivity of the test with no loss of specificity. The benefit of targeting species specific sequences is that within a mixture of two of more species, the individual species within the mixture can be identified. This identification would not be possible using standard sequencing. These new developments can lead to a greater number of samples being tested in alleged wildlife crimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20526699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.