Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20526358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Fluorescence-tracking of activation gating in human ERG channels reveals rapid S4 movement and slow pore opening.

Zeineb Es-Salah-Lamoureux, Robert Fougere, Ping Yu Xiong, Gail A Robertson, David Fedida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Determinants of Voltage-Dependent Gating in Kv11.1 Channels.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Selectivity filter modalities and rapid inactivation of the hERG1 channel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gating mechanism of Kv11.1 (hERG) KPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeineb Es-Salah-LamoureuxDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Robert Fougere
Ping Yu Xiong
Gail A Robertson
David Fedida
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

hERG Channel Assembly and TraffickingR01HL081780 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROBERTSON, GAIL A · 2005 to 2014
$3.2M
CIHRNHLBI NIH HHS HL081780NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundhERG channels are physiologically important ion channels which mediate cardiac repolarization as a result of their unusual gating properties. These are very slow activation compared with other mammalian voltage-gated potassium channels, and extremely rapid inactivation. The mechanism of slow activation is not well understood and is investigated here using fluorescence as a direct measure of S4 movement and pore opening. METHODS AND

findingsTetramethylrhodamine-5-maleimide (TMRM) fluorescence at E519 has been used to track S4 voltage sensor movement, and channel opening and closing in hERG channels. Endogenous cysteines (C445 and C449) in the S1-S2 linker bound TMRM, which caused a 10 mV hyperpolarization of the V((1/2)) of activation to -27.5+/-2.0 mV, and showed voltage-dependent fluorescence signals. Substitution of S1-S2 linker cysteines with valines allowed unobstructed recording of S3-S4 linker E519C and L520C emission signals. Depolarization of E519C channels caused rapid initial fluorescence quenching, fit with a double Boltzmann relationship, F-V(ON), with V((1/2)) (,1) = -37.8+/-1.7 mV, and V((1/2)) (,2) = 43.5+/-7.9 mV. The first phase, V((1/2)) (,1), was approximately 20 mV negative to the conductance-voltage relationship measured from ionic tail currents (G-V((1/2)) = -18.3+/-1.2 mV), and relatively unchanged in a non-inactivating E519C:S620T mutant (V((1/2)) = -34.4+/-1.5 mV), suggesting the fast initial fluorescence quenching tracked S4 voltage sensor movement. The second phase of rapid quenching was absent in the S620T mutant. The E519C fluorescence upon repolarization (V((1/2)) = -20.6+/-1.2, k = 11.4 mV) and L520C quenching during depolarization (V((1/2)) = -26.8+/-1.0, k = 13.3 mV) matched the respective voltage dependencies of hERG ionic tails, and deactivation time constants from -40 to -110 mV, suggesting they detected pore-S4 rearrangements related to ionic current flow during pore opening and closing.

conclusionTHE DATA INDICATE: 1) that rapid environmental changes occur at the outer end of S4 in hERG channels that underlie channel activation gating, and 2) that secondary slower changes reflect channel pore opening during sustained depolarizations, and channel closing upon repolarization. 3) No direct evidence was obtained of conformational changes related to inactivation from fluorophores attached at the outer end of S4.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCysteineERG1 Potassium ChannelEther-A-Go-Go Potassium ChannelsFluorescenceHumansMolecular Sequence DataMutant ProteinsRhodaminesTime FactorsXenopusCysteineERG1 Potassium ChannelEther-A-Go-Go Potassium ChannelsKCNH2 protein, humanMutant ProteinsRhodaminestetramethylrhodamine methyl ester

Identifiers

PMID20526358
PMCPMC2878317
OpenAlexW2144012920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.