Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20526331›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2010

Stimulus-driven competition in a cholinergic midbrain nucleus.

Ali Asadollahi, Shreesh P Mysore, Eric I Knudsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Auditory Competition and Stimulus Selection across Spatial Locations from Midbrain to Forebrain in Barn Owls.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Auditory Competition and Coding of Relative Stimulus Strength across Midbrain Space Maps of Barn Owls.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Synaptic properties of mouse tecto-parabigeminal pathways.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Morphology and Dendrite-Specific Synaptic Properties of Midbrain Neurons Shape Multimodal Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Categorical Signaling of the Strongest Stimulus by an Inhibitory Midbrain Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A Target-Detecting Visual Neuron in the Dragonfly Locks on to Selectively Attended Targets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Superior colliculus encodes visual saliency before the primary visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali AsadollahiDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. asad@stanford.edu
Shreesh P Mysore
Eric I Knudsen

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Visual and Auditory Stimulus SelectionR01EY019179 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KNUDSEN, ERIC · 2008 to 2013
$3.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms by which the brain selects a particular stimulus as the next target for gaze are poorly understood. A cholinergic nucleus in the owl's midbrain exhibits functional properties that suggest its role in bottom-up stimulus selection. Neurons in the nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis (Ipc) responded to wide ranges of visual and auditory features, but they were not tuned to particular values of those features. Instead, they encoded the relative strengths of stimuli across the entirety of space. Many neurons exhibited switch-like properties, abruptly increasing their responses to a stimulus in their receptive field when it became the strongest stimulus. This information propagates directly to the optic tectum, a structure involved in gaze control and stimulus selection, as periodic (25-50 Hz) bursts of cholinergic activity. The functional properties of Ipc neurons resembled those of a salience map, a core component in computational models for spatial attention and gaze control.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionChoice BehaviorCholinergic FibersConflict, PsychologicalFixation, OcularNeural InhibitionPedunculopontine Tegmental NucleusPhotic StimulationStrigiformesSuperior ColliculiVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID20526331
PMCPMC2893238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.