Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2052585›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1991

Microtubule mediation of cytoplasmic and nuclear maturation during the early stages of resumed meiosis in cultured mouse oocytes.

J Van Blerkom

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mitochondria in oocyte aging: current understanding.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Van BlerkomDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0347.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

ASSESSMENT OF CRYOPRESERVED EMBRYO VIABILITYR01HD021582 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI VAN BLERKOM, JONATHAN · 1986 to 1988
–
NICHD NIH HHS HD 21582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A perinuclear accumulation of mitochondria characterizes the premetaphase I stages of reinitiated meiosis in the laboratory mouse oocyte. The cellular basis of this organelle-specific translocation was examined by fluorescent probe analysis, immunostaining, and immunoelectron microscopy in oocytes cultured at specific stages of meiotic maturation in the presence and absence of drugs that influence the stability of microfilaments and microtubules. The results suggest that a temporal, spatial, and developmental relationship exists between the location of microtubule organizing centers and the progressive translocation of mitochondria to the nuclear region. The findings indicate that mitochondrial translocations are mediated by microtubules and that individual microtubule organizing centers are not only foci for mitochondrial aggregation but may also facilitate the establishment of the circular bivalent configuration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusCells, CulturedChromosomesFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMeiosisMiceMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronMicrotubulesMitochondriaOocytesTubulinTubulin

Identifiers

PMID2052585
PMCPMC51801
OpenAlexW2109664810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.