Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20525756›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2010

Safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the combination of sorafenib and tanespimycin.

Ulka N Vaishampayan, Angelika M Burger, Edward A Sausville, Lance K Heilbrun, Jing Li, M Naomi Horiba, Merrill J Egorin, Percy Ivy, Simon Pacey, Patricia M Lorusso

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Combination of Anti-Cancer Drugs with Molecular Chaperone Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulka N VaishampayanBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. vaishamu@karmanos.org
Angelika M Burger
Edward A Sausville
Lance K Heilbrun
Jing Li
M Naomi Horiba
Merrill J Egorin
Percy Ivy
Simon Pacey
Patricia M Lorusso
Royal Marsden Hospital · GBThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USWayne State University · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Zonulin Antibodies in Intestinal Permeabilitiy in IDDMM01RR016500 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI OSWALD, LYNN M · 2002 to 2009
$20.2M
PHASE I TRIALS OF NEW ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA062487 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LORUSSO, PATRICIA M. · 1994 to 2013
$8.4M
Phase I Clinical Trials of Novel Anticancer AgentsU01CA099168 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHU, EDWARD · 2003 to 2013
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS 5UO1CA062487-14NCI NIH HHS CA-22543NCI NIH HHS U01 CA062487NCI NIH HHS U01 CA099168NCI NIH HHS UO1CA099168NCRR NIH HHS 2MO1RR016500-006PHS HHS 26XS162PHS HHS P6972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHeat shock protein (Hsp) 90 inhibition affects the Raf kinase signaling pathway and could enhance antitumor effects of sorafenib, a Raf kinase inhibitor. The combination of sorafenib and tanespimycin [17-allyl-amino-geldanamycin (17-AAG); NSC 330507/KOS-953] was evaluated in a phase I trial with the primary objective of defining a phase II dose. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe dose cohorts consisted of fixed continuous oral dosing of 400 mg sorafenib twice daily, starting at 14 days before tanespimycin, which was administered intravenously at escalating doses (starting at 300 mg/m,(2) with 50 mg/m(2) increments), on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Toxicity was assessed weekly, and response was evaluated every two cycles.

resultsTwenty-seven toxicity-evaluable patients were enrolled and treated at four dose levels. Predominant primary malignancies were renal cancer (12), melanoma (6), and colorectal cancer (4). Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 transaminitis and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in one patient each were observed at 450 mg/m(2) of tanespimycin. One hundred fourteen cycles were administered with a median of four cycles (range 1-17 cycles). Plasma concentrations of sorafenib and metabolites reached steady state after 7 days. Tanespimycin did not alter sorafenib concentrations. Pharmacodynamics showed a decrease in Hsp90 levels and induction of Hsp70. Clinical efficacy was observed in 9 of 12 renal cancer patients and 4 of 6 melanoma patients

conclusionsRecommended phase II doses of this combination are 400 mg sorafenib twice daily and 400 mg/m(2) tanespimycin on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. Clinical and pharmacodynamic activity was observed in kidney cancer and melanoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzenesulfonatesBenzoquinonesLactams, MacrocyclicPyridinesAdultAgedClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsBenzenesulfonatesBenzoquinonesLactams, MacrocyclicNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesSorafenibtanespimycin

Identifiers

PMID20525756
PMCPMC2909581
OpenAlexW2148529174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.