Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20524383›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique

Public opinions about participating in health research.

Kay Teschke, Suhail Marino, Rong Chu, Joseph K C Tsui, M Anne Harris, Stephen A Marion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perceptions and attitudes to clinical research participation in Qatar.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Why do people participate in epidemiological research?Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kay TeschkeSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3. kay.teschke@ubc.ca
Suhail Marino
Rong Chu
Joseph K C Tsui
M Anne Harris
Stephen A Marion

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrivacy legislation has limited options for recruiting subjects to health studies. Policy changes are motivated by assumptions about public attitudes towards participation, yet surveys of attitudes have rarely been done. We investigated public willingness to participate in health research and how willingness was affected by various factors.

methodsA survey of adults randomly selected from the telephone directory was conducted in British Columbia, Canada. Mailed self-administered questionnaires asked about willingness to participate in health research and the influence on willingness of the method of subject selection, the organization making the contact, and other factors.

resultsThere were 1,477 respondents (58% of eligible); 85% were willing to participate in health research at least sometimes. The organization making the contact influenced comfort about participation: 10% of respondents felt uncomfortable if contacted by a university, 12% if by a hospital, 26% if by government, and 55% if by private research firms. Factors most positively influencing choice to participate were future health benefits to society (87%) and oneself (87%), and receiving a copy of the study results (81%).

conclusionsParticipation in health research appears to be viewed favourably by members of the public, and participation may be highest when university or hospital-based researchers are able to contact subjects directly using information from government databases.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePublic OpinionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomedical ResearchBritish ColumbiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch SubjectsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20524383
PMCPMC6974298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.