Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20524069›Full record

ReviewPhotosynthesis research2010

Inorganic carbon acquisition by eukaryotic algae: four current questions.

John A Raven

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Photosynthesis research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Elevated pH Conditions Associated WithFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Enhancing (crop) plant photosynthesis by introducing novel genetic diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The effect of COPeerJ · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 3 countries.

John A RavenDivision of Plant Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee at SCRI, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK. j.a.raven@dundee.ac.uk
Crop Research Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phylogenetically and morphologically diverse eukaryotic algae are typically oxygenic photolithotrophs. They have a diversity of incompletely understood mechanisms of inorganic carbon acquisition: this article reviews four areas where investigations continue. The first topic is diffusive CO(2) entry. Most eukaryotic algae, like all cyanobacteria, have inorganic carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCMs). The ancestral condition was presumably the absence of a CCM, i.e. diffusive CO(2) entry, as found in a small minority of eukaryotic algae today; however, it is likely that, as is found in several cases, this condition is due to a loss of a CCM. There are a number of algae which are in various respects intermediate between diffusive CO(2) entry and occurrence of a CCM: further study is needed on this aspect. A second topic is the nature of cyanelles and their role in inorganic carbon assimilation. The cyanelles (plastids) of the euglyphid amoeba Paulinella have been acquired relatively recently by endosymbiosis with genetic integration of an α-cyanobacterium with a Form 1A Rubisco. The α-carboxysomes in the cyanelles are presumably involved in a CCM, but further investigation is needed.Also called cyanelles are the plastids of glaucocystophycean algae, but is it now clear that these were derived from the β-cyanobacterial ancestor of all plastids other than that of Paulinella. The resemblances of the central body of the cyanelles of glaucocystophycean algae to carboxysomes may not reflect derivation from cyanobacterial β-carboxysomes; although it is clear that these algae have CCMs but these are now well characterized. The other two topics concern CCMs in other eukaryotic algae; these CCMs arose polyphyletically and independently of the cyanobacterial CCMs. It is generally believed that eukaryotic algal, like cyanobacterial, CCMs are based on active transport of an inorganic carbon species and/or protons, and they have C(3) biochemistry. This is the case for the organism considered as the third topic, i.e. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the eukaryotic alga with the best understood CCM. This CCM involves HCO(3)(-) conversion to CO(2) in the thylakoid lumen so the external inorganic carbon must cross four membranes in series with a final CO(2) effux from the thylakoid. More remains to be investigated about this CCM. The final topic is that of the occurrence of C(4)-like metabolism in the CCMs of marine diatoms. Different conclusions have been reached depending on the organism investigated and the techniques used, and several aspects require further study.

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon DioxideChlamydomonas reinhardtiiCyanobacteriaDiatomsEukaryotaPhylogenyCarbonCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID20524069
OpenAlexW1973619027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.