ArticlePLoS genetics2010
Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Both genome instability and replicative senescence stem from the shortest telomere in telomerase-negative cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genome-wide screen reveals dependence of break induced replication on several distinct checkpoints.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The ubiquitin protease Ubp10 suppresses the formation of translocations at interstitial telomere-like sites.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Arp2/3 and type-I myosins control chromosome mobility and end-resection at double-strand breaks in S. cerevisiae.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Diploidy confers genomic instability inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- RPA and Rad27 limit templated and inverted insertions at DNA breaks.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Stressed? Break-induced replication comes to the rescue!DNA repair · 2024Review
- End resection and telomere healing of DNA double-strand breaks during nematode programmed DNA elimination.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- The functional significance of the RPA- and PCNA-dependent recruitment of Pif1 to DNA.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- End resection and telomere healing of DNA double-strand breaks during nematode programmed DNA elimination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Mitochondrial superoxide dismutase Sod2 suppresses nuclear genome instability during oxidative stress.Genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Flexible Attachment and Detachment of Centromeres and Telomeres to and from Chromosomes.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Hotspot of de novo telomere addition stabilizes linear amplicons in yeast grown in sulfate-limiting conditions.Genetics · 2023Article
- The convergence of head-on DNA unwinding forks induces helicase oligomerization and activity transition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Comprehensive analysis of cis- and trans-acting factors affecting ectopic Break-Induced Replication.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- The stabilized Pol31-Pol3 interface counteracts Pol32 ablation with differential effects on repair.Life science alliance · 2021Article
- Rad52 SUMOylation functions as a molecular switch that determines a balance between the Rad51- and Rad59-dependent survivors.iScience · 2021Article
- When the Ends Justify the Means: Regulation of Telomere Addition at Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In budding yeast, an HO endonuclease-inducible double-strand break (DSB) is efficiently repaired by several homologous recombination (HR) pathways. In contrast to gene conversion (GC), where both ends of the DSB can recombine with the same template, break-induced replication (BIR) occurs when only the centromere-proximal end of the DSB can locate homologous sequences. Whereas GC results in a small patch of new DNA synthesis, BIR leads to a nonreciprocal translocation. The requirements for completing BIR are significantly different from those of GC, but both processes require 5' to 3' resection of DSB ends to create single-stranded DNA that leads to formation of a Rad51 filament required to initiate HR. Resection proceeds by two pathways dependent on Exo1 or the BLM homolog, Sgs1. We report that Exo1 and Sgs1 each inhibit BIR but have little effect on GC, while overexpression of either protein severely inhibits BIR. In contrast, overexpression of Rad51 markedly increases the efficiency of BIR, again with little effect on GC. In sgs1Delta exo1Delta strains, where there is little 5' to 3' resection, the level of BIR is not different from either single mutant; surprisingly, there is a two-fold increase in cell viability after HO induction whereby 40% of all cells survive by formation of a new telomere within a few kb of the site of DNA cleavage. De novo telomere addition is rare in wild-type, sgs1Delta, or exo1Delta cells. In sgs1Delta exo1Delta, repair by GC is severely inhibited, but cell viability remains high because of new telomere formation. These data suggest that the extensive 5' to 3' resection that occurs before the initiation of new DNA synthesis in BIR may prevent efficient maintenance of a Rad51 filament near the DSB end. The severe constraint on 5' to 3' resection, which also abrogates activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint, permits an unprecedented level of new telomere addition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.