Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20523895›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends.

John R Lydeard, Zachary Lipkin-Moore, Suvi Jain, Vinay V Eapen, James E Haber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diploidy confers genomic instability inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The convergence of head-on DNA unwinding forks induces helicase oligomerization and activity transition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John R LydeardDepartment of Biology and Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Zachary Lipkin-Moore
Suvi Jain
Vinay V Eapen
James E Haber
Brandeis University · US

Funding

GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF REGULATIONT32GM007122 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, SUSAN THOMAS · 1985 to 2020
$7.5M
Recombination Mechanisms in Yeast Cell DifferentiationR37GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2007 to 2016
$5.5M
Analysis of Break-Induced ReplicationR01GM076020 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2006 to 2017
$3.4M
RECOMBINATION MECHANISMS IN YEAST CELL DIFFERENTIATIONR01GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 1985 to 2006
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM20056NIGMS NIH HHS GM76020NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076020NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM020056NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In budding yeast, an HO endonuclease-inducible double-strand break (DSB) is efficiently repaired by several homologous recombination (HR) pathways. In contrast to gene conversion (GC), where both ends of the DSB can recombine with the same template, break-induced replication (BIR) occurs when only the centromere-proximal end of the DSB can locate homologous sequences. Whereas GC results in a small patch of new DNA synthesis, BIR leads to a nonreciprocal translocation. The requirements for completing BIR are significantly different from those of GC, but both processes require 5' to 3' resection of DSB ends to create single-stranded DNA that leads to formation of a Rad51 filament required to initiate HR. Resection proceeds by two pathways dependent on Exo1 or the BLM homolog, Sgs1. We report that Exo1 and Sgs1 each inhibit BIR but have little effect on GC, while overexpression of either protein severely inhibits BIR. In contrast, overexpression of Rad51 markedly increases the efficiency of BIR, again with little effect on GC. In sgs1Delta exo1Delta strains, where there is little 5' to 3' resection, the level of BIR is not different from either single mutant; surprisingly, there is a two-fold increase in cell viability after HO induction whereby 40% of all cells survive by formation of a new telomere within a few kb of the site of DNA cleavage. De novo telomere addition is rare in wild-type, sgs1Delta, or exo1Delta cells. In sgs1Delta exo1Delta, repair by GC is severely inhibited, but cell viability remains high because of new telomere formation. These data suggest that the extensive 5' to 3' resection that occurs before the initiation of new DNA synthesis in BIR may prevent efficient maintenance of a Rad51 filament near the DSB end. The severe constraint on 5' to 3' resection, which also abrogates activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint, permits an unprecedented level of new telomere addition.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, FungalTelomereBase SequenceDNA PrimersDNA ReplicationExodeoxyribonucleasesGene ConversionGenes, FungalPolymerase Chain ReactionRecQ HelicasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranslocation, GeneticDNA Primersexodeoxyribonuclease IExodeoxyribonucleasesRecQ HelicasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSGS1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID20523895
PMCPMC2877739
OpenAlexW2073756937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.