ArticlePLoS computational biology2010
A quick guide to large-scale genomic data mining.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative multi-omics and systems bioinformatics in translational neuroscience: A data mining perspective.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Contrast subgraphs allow comparing homogeneous and heterogeneous networks derived from omics data.GigaScience · 2022Article
- A new challenge for data analytics: transposons.BioData mining · 2022Article
- CGAT: a model for immersive personalized training in computational genomics.Briefings in functional genomics · 2016Review
- Metagenome Skimming of Insect Specimen Pools: Potential for Comparative Genomics.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Interactive exploration of integrated biological datasets using context-sensitive workflows.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Article
- Compressive genomics for protein databases.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Lessons learned and unlearned in periodontal microbiology.Periodontology 2000 · 2013Review
- Computational solutions for omics data.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2013Review
- Regulatory component analysis: a semi-blind extraction approach to infer gene regulatory networks with imperfect biological knowledge.Signal processing · 2012Article
- Compressive genomics.Nature biotechnology · 2012Article
- A Resource of Quantitative Functional Annotation for Homo sapiens Genes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2012Article
- Mining high-throughput experimental data to link gene and function.Trends in biotechnology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.