Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20523739›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2010

Identifying tightly regulated and variably expressed networks by Differential Rank Conservation (DIRAC).

James A Eddy, Leroy Hood, Nathan D Price, Donald Geman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Coaching for Cognition in Alzheimer's (COCOA) trial: Study design.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The recent progress and therapy in endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Digitizing omics profiles by divergence from a baseline.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James A EddyInstitute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Leroy Hood
Nathan D Price
Donald Geman

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1)UL1RR025005 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$75.8M
Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Quantitative Systems BiologyP50GM076547 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI BALIGA, NITIN S · 2006 to 2016
$30.6M
Identifying network pertubation using secreted protein profiles in glioblastomaR00CA126184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI PRICE, NATHAN D · 2009 to 2011
$747k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS R00 CA126184NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR 025005NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025005NIGMS NIH HHS GM076547NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A powerful way to separate signal from noise in biology is to convert the molecular data from individual genes or proteins into an analysis of comparative biological network behaviors. One of the limitations of previous network analyses is that they do not take into account the combinatorial nature of gene interactions within the network. We report here a new technique, Differential Rank Conservation (DIRAC), which permits one to assess these combinatorial interactions to quantify various biological pathways or networks in a comparative sense, and to determine how they change in different individuals experiencing the same disease process. This approach is based on the relative expression values of participating genes-i.e., the ordering of expression within network profiles. DIRAC provides quantitative measures of how network rankings differ either among networks for a selected phenotype or among phenotypes for a selected network. We examined disease phenotypes including cancer subtypes and neurological disorders and identified networks that are tightly regulated, as defined by high conservation of transcript ordering. Interestingly, we observed a strong trend to looser network regulation in more malignant phenotypes and later stages of disease. At a sample level, DIRAC can detect a change in ranking between phenotypes for any selected network. Variably expressed networks represent statistically robust differences between disease states and serve as signatures for accurate molecular classification, validating the information about expression patterns captured by DIRAC. Importantly, DIRAC can be applied not only to transcriptomic data, but to any ordinal data type.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasmsPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID20523739
PMCPMC2877722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.