ArticleNeuroradiology2011
Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms with an optical pressure sensor system.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vessel Curvature and Microcatheter-Detachable Coil Compatibility in Arterial Coil Embolization.Cureus · 2025Article
- Robotics for Neuroendovascular Therapy.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Contact Force between Aneurysm Model and Coil for Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2021Article
- Experimental study of coil delivery wire insertion force in intracranial aneurysm embolization: force discrepancy generated inside the microcatheter through that coil delivery wire passes.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2019Article
- Experimental study of the characteristics of various types of filling coils for intracranial aneurysm embolisation.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018Article
- Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of finishing coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in an experimental model with radiolucent coils.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2017Article
- Force characterization of intracranial endovascular embolization: coil type, microcatheter placement, and insertion rate.Neurosurgery · 2014Article
- Remote Surgery Using a Neuroendovascular Intervention Support Robot Equipped with a Sensing Function: Experimental Verification.Asian journal of neurosurgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn coil embolization for an intracranial aneurysm, it is important to appropriately choose the coil most suitable for coping with various unforeseen situations. Additionally, because dense coil packing of the aneurysm sac is the most important factor to avoid a recurrence, properly selecting the coil is essential. In this article, the authors measured the coil insertion pressure of various types of coils with a newly developed sensor system, and coil characteristics were investigated.
methodsThe sensor consists of a hemostatic valve connected to the proximal end of a microcatheter. The sensor principle is based on an optical system. Using this, an experimental silicone aneurysm embolization was performed automatically at constant speed. The pattern of the insertion pressure and the maximum insertion pressure (MIP) were analyzed for the various types of coils. The sensor continuously monitored the mechanical force during the insertions.
resultsThe sensor adequately recorded the coil insertion pressure during embolization in each coil. MIP was generally ranked in order of the coil type. The soft type coils required relatively less insertion pressure than standard/helical and 3D type. As for the patterns of coil insertion pressure, each coil presented a saw-like pressure pattern, though we observed some slight differences. 3D type coils showed peak pressure at the moment of "painting". Coil loop diameters barely affected MIP. However, as to the patterns of pressure, larger size coils more often presented the peak.
conclusionsCoil characteristics were well evaluated. The results obtained here reflected some actual clinical experience. Furthermore, collecting the in vivo study is mandatory, which may provide clinically useful data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20521144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.