Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20521144›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2011

Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms with an optical pressure sensor system.

Noriaki Matsubara, Shigeru Miyachi, Yoshitaka Nagano, Tomotaka Ohshima, Osamu Hososhima, Takashi Izumi, Arihito Tsurumi, Toshihiko Wakabayashi, Akihito Sano, Hideo Fujimoto

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Robotics for Neuroendovascular Therapy.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experimental study of the characteristics of various types of filling coils for intracranial aneurysm embolisation.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of finishing coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in an experimental model with radiolucent coils.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noriaki MatsubaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8550, Japan. mnoriaki0817@yahoo.co.jp
Shigeru Miyachi
Yoshitaka Nagano
Tomotaka Ohshima
Osamu Hososhima
Takashi Izumi
Arihito Tsurumi
Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Akihito Sano
Hideo Fujimoto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn coil embolization for an intracranial aneurysm, it is important to appropriately choose the coil most suitable for coping with various unforeseen situations. Additionally, because dense coil packing of the aneurysm sac is the most important factor to avoid a recurrence, properly selecting the coil is essential. In this article, the authors measured the coil insertion pressure of various types of coils with a newly developed sensor system, and coil characteristics were investigated.

methodsThe sensor consists of a hemostatic valve connected to the proximal end of a microcatheter. The sensor principle is based on an optical system. Using this, an experimental silicone aneurysm embolization was performed automatically at constant speed. The pattern of the insertion pressure and the maximum insertion pressure (MIP) were analyzed for the various types of coils. The sensor continuously monitored the mechanical force during the insertions.

resultsThe sensor adequately recorded the coil insertion pressure during embolization in each coil. MIP was generally ranked in order of the coil type. The soft type coils required relatively less insertion pressure than standard/helical and 3D type. As for the patterns of coil insertion pressure, each coil presented a saw-like pressure pattern, though we observed some slight differences. 3D type coils showed peak pressure at the moment of "painting". Coil loop diameters barely affected MIP. However, as to the patterns of pressure, larger size coils more often presented the peak.

conclusionsCoil characteristics were well evaluated. The results obtained here reflected some actual clinical experience. Furthermore, collecting the in vivo study is mandatory, which may provide clinically useful data.

Indexed as

Optical DevicesTransducersEmbolization, TherapeuticEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansIntracranial AneurysmManometryPressureReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.