Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20521058›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2010

Prevalence and overlap of different lipid abnormalities in statin-treated patients at high cardiovascular risk in clinical practice in Germany.

Anselm K Gitt, Claus Jünger, Wenefrieda Smolka, Kurt Bestehorn

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Atorvastatin treatment and LDL cholesterol target attainment in patients at very high cardiovascular risk.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  10. Risk prediction with triglycerides in patients with stable coronary disease on statin treatment.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Assessment of serum cotinine in patients with chronic heart failure: self-reported versus objective smoking behaviour.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anselm K GittInstitut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen an der Universität Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Claus Jünger
Wenefrieda Smolka
Kurt Bestehorn
MSD (Germany) · DEHeidelberg University · DEStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn line with current guideline recommendations, patients at high cardiovascular risk are usually treated with statins for secondary as well as for primary prevention. While many studies investigated treatment goal achievement with regards to low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) there is paucity of data regarding high density lipoprotein (HDL-C), and/or triglycerides (TG).

settingProspective, cross-sectional study (Dyslipidemia International Survey, DYSIS) with data provided by 748 office-based physicians throughout Germany.

methodsConsecutive patients were eligible for participation, if they were at least 45 years old, currently treated with a statin and had had a documented lipid profile (at least 1 parameter) within the last 6 months. Besides descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed with backward selection to assess predictors for lipid abnormalities (non-attainment of goals for TC, LDL-C, low HDL-C or elevated TG) classified according to current European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

resultsThe 4,282 documented patients (98.6% Caucasian, 56.4% male; 86.6% at high cardiovascular risk) were predominantly treated with simvastatin (83.9%), pravastatin (7.7%) or atorvastatin (3.9%), usually with doses equivalent to simvastatin 20-40 mg daily. Non-statins were used in at most 12% of patients. No lipid abnormalities were found in 21.0% of patients, one abnormality in 38.5%, two in 31.9%, and all three in 8.5%. LDL-C goals were not attained in 58.1%, elevated TC was found in 66.6%, low HDL-C in 22.7%, and elevated TG in 47.3%. In the multivariate logistic regression model, non-attainment of LDL-C levels was predicted by hypertension (odds ratio, OR 1.4), current smoking (OR 1.3), sedentary lifestyle (OR 1.3), and female gender (OR 1.3). On the other hand, a reduced risk for missing LDL-C targets was noted in the presence of ischemic heart disease (OR 0.6), diabetes (0.5), higher statin doses, ezetimibe treatment, or specialist care, respectively.

conclusionA substantial proportion of statin-treated patients not only missed targets for LDL-C, but also did not attain the normal levels for HDL-C and/or TG. There is a large disconnect between high prevalence of HDL and/or TG disorders, with or without elevated LDL-C, and utilization of therapies targeting these lipids. Particularly in high-risk patients, additional efforts should be made to improve their lipid profile.

Indexed as

AgedCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDyslipidemiasFemaleGermanyHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipidsMalePrevalencePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipids

Identifiers

PMID20521058
PMCPMC2959161
OpenAlexW2012161457

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.