ArticleExperimental brain research2010
An anti-Hick's effect for exogenous, but not endogenous, saccadic eye movements.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response selection in prosaccades, antisaccades, and other volitional saccades.Experimental brain research · 2012Trial
- Race to accumulate evidence for few and many saccade alternatives: an exception to speed-accuracy trade-off.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- The antisaccade task: visual distractors elicit a location-independent planning 'cost'.PloS one · 2015Article
- Manipulations of the relationship between response alternatives and exogenous saccade latencies.Experimental brain research · 2011Article
- A memory-based model of Hick's law.Cognitive psychology · 2011Article
- Exploring attention-based explanations for some violations of Hick's law for aimed movements.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previously, we have shown that the reaction times (RTs) of exogenously generated saccadic eye movements decrease with an increase in the number of response alternatives (Lawrence et al. in J Vis 8(26):1-7, 2008; Lawrence and Gardella in Exp Brain Res 195(3):413-418, 2009). Because this pattern of RTs is in the direction opposite that predicted by Hick (Q J Exp Psychol 4:11-26, 1952), we termed the effect an "anti-Hick's" effect. In the present study, we examined whether this effect characterizes saccades in general, or only those saccades that are exogenously generated. An anti-Hick's effect was found for exogenous, but not for endogenous, saccades. These results demonstrate a clear dissociation between exogenously and endogenously generated saccades and place an important constraint on the anti-Hick's effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20521032What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.