Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20520820›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2010

Preferential amplification of CD8 effector-T cells after transcutaneous application of an inactivated influenza vaccine: a randomized phase I trial.

Behazine Combadière, Annika Vogt, Brice Mahé, Dominique Costagliola, Sabrina Hadam, Olivia Bonduelle, Wolfram Sterry, Shlomo Staszewski, Hans Schaefer, Sylvie van der Werf and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00261001 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomized Comparative Phase I Study to Evaluate and to Compare the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Transcutaneous Mode of Administration of a Licensed Tetanus/Influenza Vaccine to the Conventional Intramuscular Route of Vaccine Administration in Healthy Volunteers and HIV-infected Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorObjectif Recherche Vaccins SIDARan2005 to 2009Enrolled38ConditionsHealthy Volunteers, HIV InfectionArmsTranscutaneous mode of administration, Intramuscular mode of administration
NCT01707602 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Immunization Routes on the Immune Response to Influenza Vaccine

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2012 to 2013Enrolled60ConditionsInfluenzaArmsINTANZA® 15, Vaxigrip®, INTANZA® 15 T
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Microneedle-based two-step transdermal delivery of Langerhans cell-targeting immunoliposomes induces a Th1-biased immune response.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of vaccine formulations: past, present, and future.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Review
  12. Engineered drug delivery devices to address Global Health challenges.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Behazine CombadièreInstitut National de Santé et de Recherche Médicale, INSERM U945, Paris, France. behazine.combadiere@upmc.fr
Annika Vogt
Brice Mahé
Dominique Costagliola
Sabrina Hadam
Olivia Bonduelle
Wolfram Sterry
Shlomo Staszewski
Hans Schaefer
Sylvie van der Werf
Christine Katlama
Brigitte Autran
Ulrike Blume-Peytavi
Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science · DESorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEInserm · FRInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent conventional vaccination approaches do not induce potent CD8 T-cell responses for fighting mostly variable viral diseases such as influenza, avian influenza viruses or HIV. Following our recent study on vaccine penetration by targeting of vaccine to human hair follicular ducts surrounded by Langerhans cells, we tested in the first randomized Phase-Ia trial based on hair follicle penetration (namely transcutaneous route) the induction of virus-specific CD8 T cell responses. METHODS AND

findingsWe chose the inactivated influenza vaccine - a conventional licensed tetanus/influenza (TETAGRIP) vaccine - to compare the safety and immunogenicity of transcutaneous (TC) versus IM immunization in two randomized controlled, multi-center Phase I trials including 24 healthy-volunteers and 12 HIV-infected patients. Vaccination was performed by application of inactivated influenza vaccine according to a standard protocol allowing the opening of the hair duct for the TC route or needle-injection for the IM route. We demonstrated that the safety of the two routes was similar. We showed the superiority of TC application, but not the IM route, to induce a significant increase in influenza-specific CD8 cytokine-producing cells in healthy-volunteers and in HIV-infected patients. However, these routes did not differ significantly for the induction of influenza-specific CD4 responses, and neutralizing antibodies were induced only by the IM route. The CD8 cell response is thus the major immune response observed after TC vaccination.

conclusionsThis Phase Ia clinical trial (Manon05) testing an anti-influenza vaccine demonstrated that vaccines designed for antibody induction by the IM route, generate vaccine-specific CD8 T cells when administered transcutaneously. These results underline the necessity of adapting vaccination strategies to control complex infectious diseases when CD8 cellular responses are crucial. Our work opens up a key area for the development of preventive and therapeutic vaccines for diseases in which CD8 cells play a crucial role.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00261001.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationAntibody SpecificityCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationDemographyFlow CytometryHealthHIV InfectionsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesTetanus ToxoidVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID20520820
PMCPMC2877091
OpenAlexW2073367505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.