Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20520722›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Optimisation of bioluminescent reporters for use with mycobacteria.

Nuria Andreu, Andrea Zelmer, Taryn Fletcher, Paul T Elkington, Theresa H Ward, Jorge Ripoll, Tanya Parish, Gregory J Bancroft, Ulrich Schaible, Brian D Robertson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
202citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

202 citing papers in PubMed, 364 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CMPK2 restrictsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Combating Drug Resistance inBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026
    Article
  14. Computational and Experimental Characterization ofBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Common Biological Properties ofACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Article

142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Nuria AndreuDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andrea Zelmer
Taryn Fletcher
Paul T Elkington
Theresa H Ward
Jorge Ripoll
Tanya Parish
Gregory J Bancroft
Ulrich Schaible
Brian D Robertson
Siouxsie Wiles
Imperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBFoundation for Research and Technology Hellas · GRQueen Mary University of London · GBResearch Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E52708X/1Department of Health DHCS/06/05/012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis, still represents a major public health threat in many countries. Bioluminescence, the production of light by luciferase-catalyzed reactions, is a versatile reporter technology with multiple applications both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) represents one of its most outstanding uses by allowing the non-invasive localization of luciferase-expressing cells within a live animal. Despite the extensive use of luminescent reporters in mycobacteria, the resultant luminescent strains have not been fully applied to BLI. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsOne of the main obstacles to the use of bioluminescence for in vivo imaging is the achievement of reporter protein expression levels high enough to obtain a signal that can be detected externally. Therefore, as a first step in the application of this technology to the study of mycobacterial infection in vivo, we have optimised the use of firefly, Gaussia and bacterial luciferases in mycobacteria using a combination of vectors, promoters, and codon-optimised genes. We report for the first time the functional expression of the whole bacterial lux operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. smegmatis thus allowing the development of auto-luminescent mycobacteria. We demonstrate that the Gaussia luciferase is secreted from bacterial cells and that this secretion does not require a signal sequence. Finally we prove that the signal produced by recombinant mycobacteria expressing either the firefly or bacterial luciferases can be non-invasively detected in the lungs of infected mice by bioluminescence imaging. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: While much work remains to be done, the finding that both firefly and bacterial luciferases can be detected non-invasively in live mice is an important first step to using these reporters to study the pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis and other mycobacterial species in vivo. Furthermore, the development of auto-luminescent mycobacteria has enormous ramifications for high throughput mycobacterial drug screening assays which are currently carried out either in a destructive manner using LuxAB or the firefly luciferase.

Indexed as

AnimalsCodonGene ExpressionGenes, ReporterGenetic VectorsImaging, Three-DimensionalKineticsLuciferasesLuminescent ProteinsMiceMycobacterium smegmatisWhole Body ImagingCodonLuciferasesLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20520722
PMCPMC2875389
OpenAlexW2084914723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.