Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20520718›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Integrative genome comparison of primary and metastatic melanomas.

Omar Kabbarah, Cristina Nogueira, Bin Feng, Rosalynn M Nazarian, Marcus Bosenberg, Min Wu, Kenneth L Scott, Lawrence N Kwong, Yonghong Xiao, Carlos Cordon-Cardo and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Regulatory Mechanisms of SPARC Overexpression in Melanoma Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Omar KabbarahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cristina Nogueira
Bin Feng
Rosalynn M Nazarian
Marcus Bosenberg
Min Wu
Kenneth L Scott
Lawrence N Kwong
Yonghong Xiao
Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Scott R Granter
Sridhar Ramaswamy
Todd Golub
Lyn M Duncan
Stephan N Wagner
Cameron Brennan
Lynda Chin

Funding

Variation in Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Breast Cancer RiskP50CA089393 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI HARRIS, LYNDSAY NORINE · 2000 to 2009
$28.8M
Targeting Raf in Melanoma: Mechanisms for Effect & Resistance & Opportunities forP50CA093683 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GOLUB, TODD R. · 2001 to 2012
$25.8M
DERMATOLOGY TRAINING GRANTT32AR007098 · NIAMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI THOMAS S. KUPPER · 1986 to 2026
$8.1M
MOUSE MODEL OF MALIGNANT MELANOMAU01CA084313 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI DEPINHO, RONALD ANTHONY · 1999 to 2008
$7.4M
The genetic Basis of Melanoma MetastasisR01CA093947 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI CHIN, LYNDA · 2002 to 2011
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA089393NCI NIH HHS P50 CA093683NCI NIH HHS P50 CA93683NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093947NCI NIH HHS R01 CA93947NCI NIH HHS U01 CA084313NCI NIH HHS U01 CA84313NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007098NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR07098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cardinal feature of malignant melanoma is its metastatic propensity. An incomplete view of the genetic events driving metastatic progression has been a major barrier to rational development of effective therapeutics and prognostic diagnostics for melanoma patients. In this study, we conducted global genomic characterization of primary and metastatic melanomas to examine the genomic landscape associated with metastatic progression. In addition to uncovering three genomic subclasses of metastastic melanomas, we delineated 39 focal and recurrent regions of amplification and deletions, many of which encompassed resident genes that have not been implicated in cancer or metastasis. To identify progression-associated metastasis gene candidates, we applied a statistical approach, Integrative Genome Comparison (IGC), to define 32 genomic regions of interest that were significantly altered in metastatic relative to primary melanomas, encompassing 30 resident genes with statistically significant expression deregulation. Functional assays on a subset of these candidates, including MET, ASPM, AKAP9, IMP3, PRKCA, RPA3, and SCAP2, validated their pro-invasion activities in human melanoma cells. Validity of the IGC approach was further reinforced by tissue microarray analysis of Survivin showing significant increased protein expression in thick versus thin primary cutaneous melanomas, and a progression correlation with lymph node metastases. Together, these functional validation results and correlative analysis of human tissues support the thesis that integrated genomic and pathological analyses of staged melanomas provide a productive entry point for discovery of melanoma metastases genes.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationDisease ProgressionGene AmplificationGene DeletionGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene RearrangementGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMelanomaMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisSkin NeoplasmsBIRC5 protein, humanInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsSurvivin

Identifiers

PMID20520718
PMCPMC2875381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.