Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20519484›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

HIV load testing with small samples of whole blood.

Katrin Steinmetzer, Thomas Seidel, Andreas Stallmach, Eugen Ermantraut

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Point-of-care testing.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katrin SteinmetzerClondiag GmbH, Löbstedter Strasse 105, 07749 Jena, Germany. katrin@clondiag.com
Thomas Seidel
Andreas Stallmach
Eugen Ermantraut

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load (VL) testing is of paramount importance for the success of antiretroviral therapy treatment campaigns throughout the world. In many countries, limited laboratory infrastructure and transport capacities preclude a substantial number of people infected with HIV from accessing the necessary testing. Point-of-care diagnostic testing methods for those with HIV infection provide a compelling solution to addressing this challenge. To facilitate ease of use in such tests, finger-stick whole blood (WB) would constitute an ideal sample type if test performance equivalent to laboratory testing could be ensured. To determine the diagnostic sensitivity of a VL assay based on small volumes of WB, we analyzed 1,094 sample pairs of 1 ml of plasma and 10 microl of WB from donors confirmed to be HIV positive. The probability of detecting HIV nucleic acids in 10 microl of blood was 59.3% (95% confidence interval, 54.9 to 63.6%), 85.1% (80.0 to 90.2%), 91.5% (88.1 to 95%), and 100% when the corresponding plasma samples had an undetectable VL, a detectable VL less than 40 viral copies/ml (cp/ml), a VL between 40 and 4,000 cp/ml, and a VL greater than 4,000 cp/ml, respectively. Capillary blood and venous blood yielded comparable diagnostic sensitivities. Furthermore, our data indicate that WB could be used to monitor VL changes after highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) started. Thus, we have demonstrated the feasibility of small volumes of venous and finger-stick WB as valid samples for VL testing. This approach should facilitate the development of robust point-of-care HIV VL tests.

Indexed as

BloodHIV InfectionsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityViral Load

Identifiers

PMID20519484
PMCPMC2916564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.