Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20519470›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

Identification of Paecilomyces variotii in clinical samples and settings.

Jos Houbraken, Paul E Verweij, Anthonius J M M Rijs, Andrew M Borman, Robert A Samson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SystemicMedical mycology case reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Successful Treatment ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  11. A Polyphasic Approach including Whole Genome Sequencing RevealsJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Paecilomyces variotti in deep dental caries.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Species Identification and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Case Report: Novel DisseminatedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jos HoubrakenCBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Department of Applied and Industrial Mycology, Utrecht 3584 CT, Netherlands. j.houbraken@cbs.knaw.nl
Paul E Verweij
Anthonius J M M Rijs
Andrew M Borman
Robert A Samson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paecilomyces variotii is a commonly occurring species in air and food, but it is also associated with many types of human infections and is among the emerging causative agents of opportunistic mycoses in immunocompromised hosts. Paecilomyces can cause hyalohyphomycosis, and two species, Paecilomyces lilacinus and P. variotii, are the most frequently encountered organisms. In the present study, a set of 34 clinical isolates morphologically identified as P. variotii or P. lilacinus were formally identified by sequencing intergenic transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 (including 5.8S rDNA) and a part of the beta-tubulin gene. Three isolates were identified as P. lilacinus, and five of the presumptive P. variotii isolates did not belong to the genus Paecilomyces but were identified as Talaromyces eburneus (anamorph, Geosmithia argillacea) or Hamigera avellanea (anamorph, Merimbla ingelheimense). Applying the most recent taxonomy, we found that the clinical P. variotii isolates could be identified as P. variotii sensu stricto (14 strains), P. formosus (11 strains), and P. dactylethromorphus (1 strain). These data indicate that P. formosus occurs in clinical samples as commonly as P. variotii. Susceptibility tests showed that the antifungal susceptibility profiles of P. variotii, P. formosus, and P. dactylethromorphus are similar and that all strains tested were susceptible to amphotericin B in vitro. P. lilanicus, T. eburneus, and H. avellanea had different susceptibility profiles; and flucytosine and voriconazole were the least active of the antifungal drugs tested against these species. Our results indicate that correct species identification is important to help guide appropriate antifungal therapy.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFlucytosineFungal ProteinsGenes, rRNAHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Sequence DataMycosesPaecilomycesPyrimidinesRNA, FungalRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8SAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDNA, FungalDNA, RibosomalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFlucytosineFungal ProteinsPyrimidinesRNA, FungalRNA, Ribosomal, 5.8STriazolesTubulinVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID20519470
PMCPMC2916617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.