Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20519463›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

Rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in hospitals by use of phage-derived open reading frame typing enhanced by multiplex PCR and reverse line blot assay.

Matthew V N O'Sullivan, Fanrong Kong, Vitali Sintchenko, Gwendolyn L Gilbert

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  3. Distribution of the Most PrevalentFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiplex PCR and reverse line blot hybridization assay (mPCR/RLB).Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew V N O'SullivanCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Level 3, ICPMR Building, Westmead Hospital, Darcy Road, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia. matthew.osullivan@swahs.health.nsw.gov.au
Fanrong Kong
Vitali Sintchenko
Gwendolyn L Gilbert
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relatively high-level clonality of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its frequent high-level endemicity in nosocomial settings complicate the development of methods for rapid subtyping of MRSA strains that are capable of identifying person-to-person transmission in hospitals. Phage-derived open reading frame (PDORF) typing is an MRSA typing method targeting mobile genetic elements that was recently described and evaluated using a geographically restricted set of isolates. The objective of this study was to develop a multiplex PCR-reverse line blot (mPCR/RLB) assay for PDORF typing and to test its applicability on a broad range of isolates and in an environment where MRSA is highly endemic. The 16 targets were identified using a 23-primer-pair mPCR/RLB assay with two probes for each target. The method was evaluated using 42 MRSA reference strains, including those representing major international clones, and 35 isolates from episodes of suspected nosocomial transmission. In vivo stability was explored using 81 isolate pairs. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and spa typing were performed for comparison. Among the 42 reference strains, there were 33 PFGE subtypes, 30 PDORF types, and 22 spa types. Simpson's index of diversity was 0.987, 0.971, and 0.926 for PFGE subtyping, PDORF typing, and spa typing, respectively. Typing of clinical isolates by PDORF typing and PFGE demonstrated concordant results. mPCR/RLB-based PDORF typing has similar discriminatory power to that of PFGE, can assist in tracking MRSA transmission events in a setting of high-level endemicity, and has the advantage of being a high-throughput technique.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesCross InfectionDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDNA PrimersElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMolecular EpidemiologyOligonucleotide ProbesOpen Reading FramesPolymerase Chain ReactionStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal Protein AStaphylococcus PhagesDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersOligonucleotide ProbesStaphylococcal Protein A

Identifiers

PMID20519463
PMCPMC2916565
OpenAlexW2162001776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.