Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20516128›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2010

The tumor suppressor p53: from structures to drug discovery.

Andreas C Joerger, Alan R Fersht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. MedComm · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. TowardsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The multifunctional proline-rich domain of p53 tumor suppressor.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas C JoergerMRC Centre for Protein Engineering, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom. acj2@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
Alan R Fersht

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even 30 years after its discovery, the tumor suppressor protein p53 is still somewhat of an enigma. p53's intimate and multifaceted role in the cell cycle is mirrored in its equally complex structural biology that is being unraveled only slowly. Here, we discuss key structural aspects of p53 function and its inactivation by oncogenic mutations. Concerted action of folded and intrinsically disordered domains of the highly dynamic p53 protein provides binding promiscuity and specificity, allowing p53 to process a myriad of cellular signals to maintain the integrity of the human genome. Importantly, progress in elucidating the structural biology of p53 and its partner proteins has opened various avenues for structure-guided rescue of p53 function in tumors. These emerging anticancer strategies include targeting mutant-specific lesions on the surface of destabilized cancer mutants with small molecules and selective inhibition of p53's degradative pathways.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsGene Expression RegulationHumansTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic AgentsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID20516128
PMCPMC2869527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.