Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20515896›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2011

A population-based risk algorithm for the development of diabetes: development and validation of the Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT).

Laura C Rosella, Douglas G Manuel, Charles Burchill, Thérèse A Stukel, PHIAT-DM team

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05609266 (Validation of Non-invasive Risk Models for Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes in a Swedish Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05609266 completednot on this map

Validation of Non-invasive Risk Models for Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes in a Swedish Population

TypeobservationalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan1990 to 2020Enrolled115,642ConditionsType2diabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between opioid use disorder and palliative care: a cohort study using linked health administrative data in Ontario, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Primer for artificial intelligence in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  20. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura C RosellaInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. laura.rosella@ices.on.ca
Douglas G Manuel
Charles Burchill
Thérèse A Stukel
PHIAT-DM team

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational estimates of the upcoming diabetes epidemic are needed to understand the distribution of diabetes risk in the population and to inform health policy.

objectiveTo create and validate a population-based risk prediction tool for incident diabetes using commonly collected national survey data.

methodsWith the use of a cohort design that links baseline risk factors to a validated population-based diabetes registry, a model (Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT)) was developed to predict 9-year risk for diabetes. The probability of developing diabetes was modelled using sex-specific Weibull survival functions for people > 20 years of age without diabetes (N=19,861). The model was validated in two external cohorts in Ontario (N=26,465) and Manitoba (N=9899). Predictive accuracy and model performance were assessed by comparing observed diabetes rates with predicted estimates. Discrimination and calibration were measured using a C statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² statistic (χ²(H-L)).

resultsPredictive factors included were body mass index, age, ethnicity, hypertension, immigrant status, smoking, education status and heart disease. DPoRT showed good discrimination (C=0.77-0.80) and calibration (χ²(H-L) < 20) in both external validation cohorts.

conclusionsThis algorithm can be used to estimate diabetes incidence and quantify the effect of interventions using routinely collected survey data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultCohort StudiesDiabetes MellitusEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID20515896
PMCPMC3112365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.