Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20515744›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)2010

To fuse or not to fuse: how do checkpoint and DNA repair proteins maintain telomeres?

Lakxmi Subramanian, Toru M Nakamura

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DNA repair at telomeres: keeping the ends intact.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lakxmi SubramanianDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Toru M Nakamura
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Roles of Checkpoint and DNA Repair Proteins in Fission Yeast Telomere MaintenanceR01GM078253 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NAKAMURA, TORU · 2006 to 2019
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM078253NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoint and DNA repair mechanisms play critical roles in the stable maintenance of genetic information. Various forms of DNA damage that arise inside cells due to common errors in normal cellular processes, such as DNA replication, or due to exposure to various DNA damaging agents, must be quickly detected and repaired by checkpoint signaling and repair factors. Telomeres, the natural ends of linear chromosomes, share many features with undesired "broken" DNA, and are recognized and processed by various DNA damage checkpoint and DNA repair proteins. However, their modes of action at telomeres must be altered from their actions at other DNA damage sites to avoid telomere fusions and permanent cell cycle arrest. Interestingly, accumulating evidence indicates that DNA damage checkpoint and DNA repair proteins are essential for telomere maintenance. In this article, we review our current knowledge on various mechanisms by which DNA damage checkpoint and DNA repair proteins are modulated at telomeres and how they might contribute to telomere maintenance in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAcid Anhydride HydrolasesAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA Repair EnzymesDNA ReplicationHumansMRE11 Homologue ProteinProtein BindingTelomeraseTelomereAcid Anhydride HydrolasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesMRE11 Homologue ProteinMRE11 protein, humanRAD50 protein, humanTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID20515744
PMCPMC2880829
OpenAlexW2045559169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.