Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20515432›Full record

Trial reportActa orthopaedica2010

The cost of hemiarthroplasty compared to that of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures. 2-year results involving 222 patients based on a randomized controlled trial.

Frede Frihagen, Gudrun M Waaler, Jan Erik Madsen, Lars Nordsletten, Silje Aspaas, Eline Aas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta orthopaedica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01770769 (Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01770769 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Internal Fixation to Hemiarthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2012 to 2020Enrolled220ConditionsFemoral Neck FracturesArmsHemi - arthroplasty, internal fixation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Valgus-impacted subcapital neck of femur fractures: a systematic review, meta-analysis with cost analysis of fixationHip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Total medical costs of treating femoral neck fracture patients with hemi- or total hip arthroplasty: a cost analysis of a multicenter prospective study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  6. The societal costs of femoral neck fracture patients treated with internal fixation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Trial
  7. Hemiarthroplasty compared to internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws as treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: cost-utility analysis performed alongside a randomized, controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reasons for revision of failed hemiarthroplasty: Are there any differences between unipolar and bipolar?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical results of treatment of garden type 1 and 2 femoral neck fractures in patients over 70-year old.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Frede FrihagenDepartment of Orthopedics, Oslo University Hospital, Norway. j.f.frihagen@medisin.uio.no
Gudrun M Waaler
Jan Erik Madsen
Lars Nordsletten
Silje Aspaas
Eline Aas
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere is very little information on the cost of different treatments for femoral neck fractures. We assessed whether total hospital and societal costs of treatment of elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures differ between patients operated with internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty.

methods222 patients (mean age 83 years, 165 women (74%)) who had been randomized to internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty were followed for 2 years. Resource use in hospital, rehabilitation, community-based care, and nursing home use were identified, quantified, evaluated, and analyzed.

resultsThe average cost per patient for the initial hospital stay was lower for patients in the internal fixation group than in the hemiarthroplasty group (9,044 euro vs. 11,887 euro, p < 0.01). When all hospital costs, i.e. rehabilitation, reoperations, and formal and informal contact with the hospital were included, the costs were similar (21,709 euro for internal fixation vs. 19,976 euro for hemiarthroplasty). When all costs were included (hospital admissions, cost of nursing home, and community-based care), internal fixation was the most expensive treatment (47,186 euro vs. 38,615 euro (p = 0.09)).

interpretationThe initial lower average cost per patient for internal fixation as treatment for a femoral neck fracture cannot be used as an argument in favor of this treatment, since the average cost per patient is more than outweighed by subsequent costs, mainly due to a higher reoperation rate after internal fixation.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCost of IllnessFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalHospital CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperation

Identifiers

PMID20515432
PMCPMC2917567
OpenAlexW2142499406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.