Comment on "The physical basis of model-free analysis of NMR relaxation data from proteins and complex fluids" [J. Chem. Phys. 131, 224507 (2009)].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Characterization of Internal Protein Dynamics and Conformational Entropy by NMR Relaxation.Methods in enzymology · 2019
   Article
2. Exposing the Moving Parts of Proteins with NMR Spectroscopy.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2012
   Article
3. Temperature dependence of fast carbonyl backbone dynamics in chicken villin headpiece subdomain.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The physical basis of model-free analysis of NMR relaxation data from proteins and complex fluids.2009

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as