Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2051488›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology1991

Amino acid substitution matrices from an information theoretic perspective.

S F Altschul

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MutantMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  4. Structural Immunology of SARS-CoV-2.Immunological reviews · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. SignalP: The Evolution of a Web Server.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Prediction of viral-host interactions of COVID-19 by computational methods.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S F AltschulNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein sequence alignments have become an important tool for molecular biologists. Local alignments are frequently constructed with the aid of a "substitution score matrix" that specifies a score for aligning each pair of amino acid residues. Over the years, many different substitution matrices have been proposed, based on a wide variety of rationales. Statistical results, however, demonstrate that any such matrix is implicitly a "log-odds" matrix, with a specific target distribution for aligned pairs of amino acid residues. In the light of information theory, it is possible to express the scores of a substitution matrix in bits and to see that different matrices are better adapted to different purposes. The most widely used matrix for protein sequence comparison has been the PAM-250 matrix. It is argued that for database searches the PAM-120 matrix generally is more appropriate, while for comparing two specific proteins with suspected homology the PAM-200 matrix is indicated. Examples discussed include the lipocalins, human alpha 1 B-glycoprotein, the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and the globins.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAlgorithmsModels, StatisticalMolecular Sequence DataProtein ConformationProteinsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID2051488
PMCPMC7130686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.