Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20514226›Full record

ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2009

The 'root-brain' hypothesis of Charles and Francis Darwin: Revival after more than 125 years.

Frantisek Baluska, Stefano Mancuso, Dieter Volkmann, Peter W Barlow

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plant Behavioral Ecology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Motor cognition in plants: from thought to real experiments.Theoretical and experimental plant physiology · 2024
    Article
  9. HPlant, cell & environment · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Towards the Idea of Molecular Brains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Biomolecular Basis of Cellular Consciousness via Subcellular Nanobrains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The brain: a concept in flux.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Memory inception and preservation in slime moulds: the quest for a common mechanism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  20. Jagdish Chandra Bose & plant neurobiology.The Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Frantisek BaluskaIZMB, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. baluska@uni-bonn.de
Stefano Mancuso
Dieter Volkmann
Peter W Barlow
University of Bonn · DEUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This year celebrates the 200(th) aniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin, best known for his theory of evolution summarized in On the Origin of Species. Less well known is that, in the second half of his life, Darwin's major scientific focus turned towards plants. He wrote several books on plants, the next-to-last of which, The Power of Movement of Plants, published together with his son Francis, opened plants to a new view. Here we amplify the final sentence of this book in which the Darwins proposed that: "It is hardly an exaggeration to say that the tip of the radicle thus endowed [with sensitivity] and having the power of directing the movements of the adjoining parts, acts like the brain of one of the lower animals; the brain being seated within the anterior end of the body, receiving impressions from the sense-organs, and directing the several movements." This sentence conveys two important messages: first, that the root apex may be considered to be a 'brain-like' organ endowed with a sensitivity which controls its navigation through soil; second, that the root apex represents the anterior end of the plant body. In this article, we discuss both these statements.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBiologyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansOsmosisPlant RootsStress, Physiologicalauxincognitionplant neurobiologyplant tropismsrootssensory biologysignaling

Identifiers

PMID20514226
PMCPMC2819436
OpenAlexW2042369958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.