ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2009
Assessing the utility of a demand assessment for functional analysis.
Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing Automated Nonparametric Statistical Analysis on Functional Analysis Data: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- The Use of Demand Assessments: A Brief Review and Practical Guide.Behavior analysis in practice · 2021Article
- Increasing Access and Quality of Behavior-Analytic Services for the Latinx Population.Behavior and social issues · 2021Article
- Motivating Operations and Negative Reinforcement.Perspectives on behavior science · 2020Article
- An Assessment Method for Identifying Acceptable and Effective Ways to Present Demands to an Adult With Dementia.Behavior analysis in practice · 2020Article
- A Preliminary Evaluation of Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Open-Ended Indirect Assessment.Behavior analysis in practice · 2020Article
- REDUCING AMBIGUITY IN THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR.Behavioral interventions : theory & practice in residential & community-based clinical programs · 2015Article
- Idiosyncratic variables that affect functional analysis outcomes: a review (2001-2010).Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2013Review
- Initial functional analysis outcomes and modifications in pursuit of differentiation: a summary of 176 inpatient cases.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2013Article
- False-positive tangible outcomes of functional analyses.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the utility of an assessment for identifying tasks for the functional analysis demand condition with 4 individuals who had been diagnosed with autism. During the demand assessment, a therapist presented a variety of tasks, and observers measured problem behavior and compliance to identify demands associated with low levels of compliance or high levels of problem behavior (low-probability demands) and demands associated with high levels of compliance or low levels of problem behavior (high-probability demands). Results showed that clearer functional analysis outcomes were obtained for 3 of the 4 participants when low-probability rather than high-probability demands were used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.