Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20514044›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance.

Paul E Kolenbrander, Robert J Palmer, Saravanan Periasamy, Nicholas S Jakubovics

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 633 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
633citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
36.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

633 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. IsGut microbes · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. AI-2 production inJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

573 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul E KolenbranderNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. pkolenbrander@dir.nidcr.nih.gov
Robert J Palmer
Saravanan Periasamy
Nicholas S Jakubovics
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USNewcastle University · GB

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth of oral bacteria in situ requires adhesion to a surface because the constant flow of host secretions thwarts the ability of planktonic cells to grow before they are swallowed. Therefore, oral bacteria evolved to form biofilms on hard tooth surfaces and on soft epithelial tissues, which often contain multiple bacterial species. Because these biofilms are easy to study, they have become the paradigm of multispecies biofilms. In this Review we describe the factors involved in the formation of these biofilms, including the initial adherence to the oral tissues and teeth, cooperation between bacterial species in the biofilm, signalling between the bacteria and its role in pathogenesis, and the transfer of DNA between bacteria. In all these aspects distance between cells of different species is integral for oral biofilm growth.

Indexed as

BiofilmsMetagenomeHumansMouthPeriodontal DiseasesSaliva

Identifiers

PMID20514044
OpenAlexW1992007782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.