Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20514043›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Where microbiology meets microengineering: design and applications of reporter bacteria.

Jan Roelof van der Meer, Shimshon Belkin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tunable low-rate genomic recombination with Cre-Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Smart closed-loop drug delivery systems.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Environmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan Roelof van der MeerUniversity of Lausanne, Department of Fundamental Microbiology, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. janroelof.vandermeer@unil.ch
Shimshon Belkin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria have long been the targets for genetic manipulation, but more recently they have been synthetically designed to carry out specific tasks. Among the simplest of these tasks is chemical compound and toxicity detection coupled to the production of a quantifiable reporter signal. In this Review, we describe the current design of bacterial bioreporters and their use in a range of assays to measure the presence of harmful chemicals in water, air, soil, food or biological specimens. New trends for integrating synthetic biology and microengineering into the design of bacterial bioreporter platforms are also highlighted.

Indexed as

Organisms, Genetically ModifiedBacteriaBiosensing TechniquesEnvironmental PollutantsEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID20514043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.