ArticleBiophysical journal2010
Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mitotic chromosomes are self-entangled and disentangle through a topoisomerase-II-dependent two-stage exit from mitosis.Molecular cell · 2024Article
- Chromatin phase separated nanoregions explored by polymer cross-linker models and reconstructed from single particle trajectories.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Stochastic motion and transcriptional dynamics of pairs of distal DNA loci on a compacted chromosome.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Mesoscale, long-time mixing of chromosomes and its connection to polymer dynamics.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Stochastic motion and transcriptional dynamics of pairs of distal DNA loci on a compacted chromosome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of Chromosome Folding and Nuclear Organization: Their Interplay and Open Questions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022Review
- The Physical Behavior of Interphase Chromosomes: Polymer Theory and Coarse-Grain Computer Simulations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Modeling the 3D genome of plants.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2021Article
- Chrom-Lasso: a lasso regression-based model to detect functional interactions using Hi-C data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Detecting chromosomal interactions in Capture Hi-C data with CHiCAGO and companion tools.Nature protocols · 2021Article
- Polymer modelling unveils the roles of heterochromatin and nucleolar organizing regions in shaping 3D genome organization in Arabidopsis thaliana.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Transcriptional activation during cell reprogramming correlates with the formation of 3D open chromatin hubs.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Chromatin interactome mapping at 139 independent breast cancer risk signals.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Algorithmic considerations when analysing capture Hi-C data.Wellcome open research · 2020Article
- The Rabl configuration limits topological entanglement of chromosomes in budding yeast.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Interphase human chromosome exhibits out of equilibrium glassy dynamics.Nature communications · 2018Article
- How epigenome drives chromatin folding and dynamics, insights from efficient coarse-grained models of chromosomes.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- A maximum-entropy model for predicting chromatin contacts.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Shaping epigenetic memory via genomic bookmarking.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosome conformation capture (3C) are two powerful techniques for investigating the three-dimensional organization of the genome in interphase nuclei. The use of these techniques provides complementary information on average spatial distances (FISH) and contact probabilities (3C) for specific genomic sites. To infer the structure of the chromatin fiber or to distinguish functional interactions from random colocalization, it is useful to compare experimental data to predictions from statistical fiber models. The current estimates of the fiber stiffness derived from FISH and 3C differ by a factor of 5. They are based on the wormlike chain model and a heuristic modification of the Shimada-Yamakawa theory of looping for unkinkable, unconstrained, zero-diameter filaments. Here, we provide an extended theoretical and computational framework to explain the currently available experimental data for various species on the basis of a unique, minimal model of decondensing chromosomes: a kinkable, topologically constraint, semiflexible polymer with the (FISH) Kuhn length of l(K) = 300 nm, 10 kinks per Mbp, and a contact distance of 45 nm. In particular: 1), we reconsider looping of finite-diameter filaments on the basis of an analytical approximation (novel, to our knowledge) of the wormlike chain radial density and show that unphysically large contact radii would be required to explain the 3C data based on the FISH estimate of the fiber stiffness; 2), we demonstrate that the observed interaction frequencies at short genomic lengths can be explained by the presence of a low concentration of curvature defects (kinks); and 3), we show that the most recent experimental 3C data for human chromosomes are in quantitative agreement with interaction frequencies extracted from our simulations of topologically confined model chromosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.