ArticlePharmacoEconomics2010
Time for cooperation in health economics among the modelling community.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prototype Software Framework for Transferable Computational Health Economic Models and Its Early Application in Youth Mental Health.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Transparency in Decision Modelling: What, Why, Who and How?PharmacoEconomics · 2019Review
- The Challenge of Transparency and Validation in Health Economic Decision Modelling: A View from Mount Hood.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Article
- Can You Repeat That? Exploring the Definition of a Successful Model Replication in Health Economics.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Review
- Ahead of Our Time: Collaboration in Modeling Then and Now.PharmacoEconomics · 2017Article
- Sharing is Caring: The Case for Company-Level Collaboration in Pharmacoeconomic Modelling.PharmacoEconomics · 2017Article
- Model Registration: A Call to Action.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2017Article
- Pharmacoeconomics of sublingual immunotherapy with the 5-grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2017Review
- The Efficacy, Safety, and Cost Benefit of Olanzapine versus Aprepitant in Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Pilot Study from South India.Chemotherapy research and practice · 2016Article
- Decitabine Compared with Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Pilot Study of Safety, Efficacy, and Cost-Effectiveness.Advances in hematology · 2015Article
- To model or not to model: lessons from two vaccinations.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2011Article
- Pharmacoeconomic benefit of cisplatin and etoposide chemoregimen for metastatic non small cell lung cancer: An Indian study.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20513161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.